View previous topic :: View next topic |
Message |
Author |
Anybody have an issue with this? (L) |
Chicago27 |
|
| |
 |
|
|
Cojak |
I do not have an issue with banning TRansgender folk. But then I am am old dude, with old thinking. I don't even agree with women in combat, but that is a personal opinion. I don't like men marrying men either.
I think it shows the $$ mind set in government. I read the accounting office has decided it ONLY costs the Government from 2.8 million to 5.8 million $ to have the transgenders in the military. I mean the word 'only' was used. Of course the person was comparing that to the 700Billion budget of the Military.
When I read that I think of tax payers. How many john Smiths does ti take to pay that much in taxes?????  _________________ Some facts but mostly just my opinion!
jacsher@aol.com
http://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/ |
01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011 Posts: 24285 7/28/17 12:18 am

|
|
| |
 |
|
Link |
I think banning certain types of people with severe mental and emotional problems from positions where their job will be to use rather powerful weapons and from making decisions to defend the nation is probably a good idea.
If someone has proven himself or herself (if he/she's figured that out yet) to be confused and to make bad decisions about something very basic and fundamental, why should the government hire him or her?
Suicide rates for transgenders are extremely high. The military doesn't need the financial burden, either. If car insurance companies can charge men under 25 more, why can't the government make a wise financial decision in this regard? _________________ Link |
Acts-perienced Poster Posts: 11849 7/28/17 2:25 am
|
|
| |
 |
|
Chicago27 |
Many more people have emotional problems than transgender. Shouldn't they check out each person on an individual basis?
Speaking of insurance, there was a day when black people had higher premiums for life insurance based on life expectancies. I don't think they do that anymore. |
Friendly Face Posts: 253 7/28/17 6:38 am

|
|
| |
 |
|
Nature Boy Florida |
Klinger served just fine - never got kicked out - so what's the problem? _________________ Whether you like it or not, learn to love it, because its the best thing going today! |
Acts-pert Poster Posts: 16646 7/28/17 8:03 am

|
|
| |
 |
|
UncleJD |
Nature Boy Florida wrote: | Klinger served just fine - never got kicked out - so what's the problem? |
LOL! Because Klinger knew that transvestites were mentally ill so he was trying to get section-8 out of the army. His commanders just ignored it because they knew he was only trying to get out of the army. Now, if he'd talked Hawkeye into removing certain anatomical features, then he would probably have been out on the next helicopter. |
Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere Posts: 3147 7/28/17 8:51 am

|
|
| |
 |
|
Link |
Chicago27 wrote: | Many more people have emotional problems than transgender. Shouldn't they check out each person on an individual basis? |
Sure, and if someone shows certain serious problems (e.g. having had transgendered procedures done, razor blade scars on their arms, marks from shooting up, exhibiting paranoid behavior) the army should turn him or her down. _________________ Link |
Acts-perienced Poster Posts: 11849 7/28/17 12:57 pm
|
|
| |
 |
|
Chicago27 |
Link wrote: | Chicago27 wrote: | Many more people have emotional problems than transgender. Shouldn't they check out each person on an individual basis? |
Sure, and if someone shows certain serious problems (e.g. having had transgendered procedures done, razor blade scars on their arms, marks from shooting up, exhibiting paranoid behavior) the army should turn him or her down. |
So, why make an announcement like this, causing an issue and just let the military interview each person? And, the purpose for my post is, are you comfortable with people like Rodney-Howard Browne helping make this policy? We wouldn't want him helping with who needs to be the overseer of Florida, much less who should be in the military. |
Friendly Face Posts: 253 7/28/17 2:27 pm

|
|
| |
 |
|
Cojak |
I can agree with a policy and not appreciate how it is accomplished. The jury is out in my mind of the 'use of Tweets' to govern. Not my kind of leadership, but this is a new world. I hope there is some success via Trump. I still say the conservative SC judge was just about worth all the present mess.
But I do agree with the policy of no transgender. Personally I am not too thrilled with openly homosexuals in service, but I am from the old military.
 _________________ Some facts but mostly just my opinion!
jacsher@aol.com
http://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/ |
01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011 Posts: 24285 7/28/17 8:44 pm

|
|
| |
 |
|