 |
Actscelerate.com Open Any Time -- Day or Night
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Message |
Author |
|
Link |
I can imagine a scenario. The manager of a portfolio of accounts who was working with Brother Marshall has a family emergency and turns these accounts over to another bank manager. There is a lot of bad debt, and the new account manager comes across an account of a church that is past due and comes up with the idea of putting some pressure on the denomination to pay up and sends a scary collections email to the denomination to put some pressure on the pastor or the denomination to bring the note current.
But it turns out the account manager's actions lead to the pastor and much of the congregation vacating the premises, making his loan a lot riskier. This might make an interesting business school case study for the narrow niche of managing bank loans. _________________ Link |
Acts-perienced Poster Posts: 11849 7/4/13 3:23 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
|
AB probably can't put a pastor out in 48 hours... |
COGLayman |
In my state you can't just go in and throw out a "tenant", which is basically what a pastor would be considered. Without a written lease he is assumed to have a month to month lease. The "owner" must give 30 days notice prior to the first of a month. Then if the tenant doesn't move out he must go through the eviction process which would be a couple of months.
A church building is different since it is not a personal residence. Anyway, a lot of talk about this is just hot air.
Anyone who has read the minutes knows a pastor could be removed. They seldom are. On the flip side a pastor can be taken from relative obscurity and overnight he becomes well known with a big church. The system has plusses and minuses but we all know how it works.
I think we can do a whole lot more together then we can apart. Stick with the ship! |
Friendly Face Posts: 256 7/4/13 4:48 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
Re: AB probably can't put a pastor out in 48 hours... |
mytimewillcome |
| COGLayman wrote: |
Anyone who has read the minutes knows a pastor could be removed |
But with what oversight from a General or Executive level?
What power does the General Council, Executive Council, or General Assembly have over one appointed Administrative Bishop? |
Golf Cart Mafia Underboss Posts: 3658 7/4/13 5:26 pm

|
|
|
| |
 |
|
sheepdogandy |
It appears the answer is none.
Even after contact with the Presiding Bishop of the Church of God, nothing was reconciled.
He accepted the man's resignation.
In our "event" we pettitioned the then General Overseer.
He informed us that he would not interfere with a state overseer's decisions.
Evidently these men can do whatever they desire without accountability.
At least some of them act that way. _________________ Charles A. Hutchins
Senior Pastor SPWC
Congregational Church of God
www.spwc.church |
Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology Posts: 7307 7/4/13 7:18 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
AnOnYmOuS4ArEaSoN |
There are a few people who after a 10 minute first time introduction, you know you better watch your back on....  |
Friendly Face Posts: 202 7/4/13 7:56 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
Link... |
Aaron Scott |
Link, I am hesitant to spend any more time on this matter. If these men can't or won't come to terms, then it is useless for us to belabor it. And if they can--and do--it is to be applauded and not second-guessed-to-death!
I said "Church of God" because Bro. Marshall, having received the Holy Ghost in that church (I believe that's what he said) was apparently drawn by the Lord to THAT church. THAT church is not some generic "member of the body of Christ," but a specific church: The Ennis Church of God. And if he was called to THAT church...he needs to be at THAT church.
That's how I feel about it. Not a church that is comprised of former members of the Ennis Church of God, but THE Ennis Church of God. Why? For all I know, God put him there to ensure that that church remains a going concern.
I can tell you that I have seldom seen people who leave on such terms (I am speaking specifically of anger and hurt) continue to prosper. It begins to taint their ministry. Moreover, it can find its way into the new church and wreak havoc. I don't want that for Bro. Marshall! I'm not saying that's the way it will be. But experience (not that least being AJT) tells me that it can follow this path.
At the same time, the Church of God showed very little growth in the years following the 1923 split. We maintained, but the off-the-charts growth we'd experienced before was gone for many, many years. They were meant to be TOGETHER, I think...and lost something special working apart. I hope that Bro. Marshall and Bro. Dority can find a way to mend this. It would be a testimony to God's grace, I'm sure. |
Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology Posts: 6042 7/4/13 8:52 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
sheepdogandy |
You need to come to Summerville Bro Aaron.
Sometimes it is the will of God.
God knew change was coming and He allowed the events of 1989 to transpire.
He preserved what is referred to as Classical Pentecostalism with the establishment of SPWC.
That does not mean we are the only CP church in the county.
We are'nt.
He has blessed and prospered us.
Everything we left He has restored to us.
Every aspect of Church life and ministry.
Sometimes God has a purpose and it may take years to discern it. _________________ Charles A. Hutchins
Senior Pastor SPWC
Congregational Church of God
www.spwc.church |
Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology Posts: 7307 7/4/13 9:48 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Phillip Johnson |
| Aaron, do you believe that "the church" is an organization on paper? It sounds like that is what you are advocating. |
Golf Cart Mafia Capo Famiglia Posts: 4989 7/4/13 11:38 pm

|
|
|
| |
 |
Appeal Process |
Byron Powers |
| Speaking as one who experienced a similar situation to Pastor Buck 10 years ago, there needs to be some kind of an appeal process for a pastor. I do believe that an AB should have the authority to remove a pastor, and immediately especially in situations of immorality. However, where the reason for removal seems to be nebulous, a structure should be established in the Minutes outlining a process of appeal. |
Newbie Posts: 4 7/4/13 11:39 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
Phillip... |
Aaron Scott |
I believe in the church universal. I also believe that while the Church of God is part of THE CHURCH...and I also believe that the Church of God is a SPECIAL PART of THE CHURCH.
I have long believed that the Church of God represents a key element in God's restoration of the early Church in modern times. We are not just another dime-a-dozen Pentecostal church (in a manner of speaking). We may ACT that way. We may BECOME that way. We may BELIEVE that way. But I cannot help but believe that God chose the early members of the Church of God (even before they were the Church of God) for a reason.
God could have poured out His Spirit on hundreds of other candidates. But just as Jesus, instead of being born in a palace, was laid in a manger, so, too, did God choose the poor, common folks of the Unicoi mountains to first pour out His Spirit in modern times.
So, again, we are PART of THE CHURCH. But we are, I believe, a SPECIAL part...if we can grasp and receive it. |
Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology Posts: 6042 7/5/13 6:44 am
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Nick Park |
This situation is sad indeed.
It highlights some important questions that are created by a rapidly changing church, society and culture. Is it still realistic, in the long term, for Overseers to have the power to appoint or remove pastors (except in obvious cases such as moral failure or heresy)? For how much longer will smaller churches of less than 300 members expect to be able to pay multiple members of staff? Perhaps these are issues better discussed in other threads.
I am in no rush to judge anyone in this particular scenario. People, even good Christian people, often act badly or unwisely under extreme pressure. They are also likely to misjudge others and jump to erroneous conclusions about their integrity or truthfulness. I know what it is like to pastor a church when a financial collapse means you can't pay your bills. I know what it is like to receive emails from a bank threatening foreclosure. I know what it is like to be an Overseer trying to protect a church from meltdown. I know how it feels to believe you're being forced out of a denomination. I also know what it is to be shown grace and mercy when you're underwater financially.
What I do know is that nothing that has been posted so far indicates that this particular situation is irretrievable or past the point of no return. Feelings are obviously hurt and people are feeling raw, but it seems to me that there is much to be gained if all concerned were willing to talk face to face in a spirit of prayer, humility and reconciliation. The blessings that come from unity are worth it.
Of course such reconciliation is more likely to occur if the rest of us can refrain from hearing half a story and then slinging epithets around or seeing this as a handy opportunity to air our hangups with pastors, overseers, or the denomination in general. _________________ Senior Pastor, Solid Rock Church, Drogheda
National Overseer, Church of God, Ireland
Executive Director, Evangelical Alliance Ireland
http://eaiseanchai.wordpress.com/ |
Acts Enthusiast Posts: 1021 7/5/13 7:18 am
|
|
|
| |
 |
Two more cents worth |
Mark Hardgrove |
I've been reading this thread with much interest as to how various people have responded. Some advocate for reconciliation while others seem to like (and even relish) the fact that another congregation is leaving the COG.
One needs to be mindful of the fact that we have only one side of the story. Anyone who has been in the pastorate for more than a minute knows there are always at least two sides. However, the AB probably isn't going to post his side (and in my opinion he shouldn't) on this or any other message board. Perhaps this is a case where the call for the minutes of state council meetings to be public would be to the advantage of the state office, because the AB is at distinct disadvantage in terms of publicly defending his actions.
I don't know Buck and I'm not suggesting his account is in error, but there remains another perspective, and other facts related to this story, that we simply do not have. So I do not presume to say what Buck or the AB should do. However I do wonder what I would do in a similar situation. I hope I never have to find out. _________________ Mark E. Hardgrove, D.Min., Ph.D.
Senior Pastor Conyers Church of God
http://www.conyerscog.org
Dean & VP for Academics at BHU
http://www.beulah.org/ |
Acts-celerater Posts: 854 7/5/13 7:55 am

|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Bro Bob |
When Bro Park writes, I read. We should all observe.
This much I know for certain. It is never God's will nor method for the body to be at war with itself. Every time that happens the flesh has not only entered in, but has taken over. I am not throwing rocks at any person in this particular instance.
NONE of us are equipped for every job. We know this. But somehow in the church we think the pastor is the guru for everything. Non-sense. ALL of us hold our treasure in earthen vessels.
| Quote: | The blessings that come from unity are worth it. ~ Nick Park
|
Indeed. And the result of throwing unity away is a curse.
........................
I have several observations about the situation in Ennis. When reading the timeline, I bristled when reaching the part where the state council ordered the AB to remove the pastor. ( I Know this was revisited later.) If this happened, even by insinuation, on the part of the council they were completely outside their authority. Advise? Certainly. Command? Get over yourself.
And while we obviously don't have the entire story, we do have both sides (their shouldn't BE two sides in the body!) represented.
My strongest admonishment for Buck is his mistaken idea of his personal responsibility to manage church finances. Any doubt that he thinks so is removed by his statement about personally repaying the individual who loaned / donated the mortgage payments that were in arrears.
My brother, you are to lead, but you are not personally responsible for church financial management. The church in conference is responsible for that. That means they must be informed. That means they must have a voice. And that means their decision is the one that decides the matter. IF IF IF they wish, they can designate a portion of that work to a church and pastor's council, along with a limit on what the council can do without bringing it before the body.
But Buck, YOU weren't behind in your payments, that congregation was.
It is strange to me, but I have witnessed many times a Brother, who is quite careful with his own money, be completely loose when it comes to spending someone else's money. If that council was wisely chosen, they would have dealt with this long ago.
If Paul were here today, he would tell us, "Look out from among you 7 men of honest report..." Then he would say, the seven with the best credit reports will do...
This entire thing is about money! The loss of this church, the loss of this pastor, every single bit of it! MONEY!
I don't want to hear the excuses, the economy, the loss of a good tither, none of it. Go before your congregation, or your council. Tell them you are no longer in the black, you are in the red. Do not hesitate. Change it. If you can find more funds, great. If you must make cuts, make them. But no man can tread water forever.
I don't know how long that church has been there, but if it existed back into the 50s or 60s, then this system used to be followed. It is still proscribed by the MINUTES. Ignoring them is disharmony and is not working. Stop it.
Is this fixable? Of course. There are men in that congregation who owe more than that $430k all by themselves who are paying their payments. Put them on the council. There are men whose net worth is several times that amount. Seek their wisdom. Use THEIR gift and calling.
If you are spending more than you have coming in, you will quickly drown. If you are barely treading water, you better lighten your load now. Any church, or any household, (your councilmen rule their house well, right?) that is spending every cent they have coming in is living above their means.
For goodness sakes, folks, this isn't hard. It is nothing but the simplest math.
So you are going to go independent and use the same men and the same system, and the church is going to prosper? You are kidding yourself. |
Golf Cart Mafia Underboss Posts: 3944 7/5/13 10:35 am

|
|
|
| |
 |
|
SouthGeorgiaBoy |
Nick Park and Bro Bob have both posted an excellent viewpoint on this situation.
Thanks to both of you! |
Acts Enthusiast Posts: 1037 7/5/13 11:54 am
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
diakoneo |
Bro Bob wrote:
| Quote: | I have several observations about the situation in Ennis. When reading the timeline, I bristled when reaching the part where the state council ordered the AB to remove the pastor. ( I Know this was revisited later.) If this happened, even by insinuation, on the part of the council they were completely outside their authority. Advise? Certainly. Command? Get over yourself.
And while we obviously don't have the entire story, we do have both sides (their shouldn't BE two sides in the body!) represented.
My strongest admonishment for Buck is his mistaken idea of his personal responsibility to manage church finances. Any doubt that he thinks so is removed by his statement about personally repaying the individual who loaned / donated the mortgage payments that were in arrears.
My brother, you are to lead, but you are not personally responsible for church financial management. The church in conference is responsible for that. That means they must be informed. That means they must have a voice. And that means their decision is the one that decides the matter. IF IF IF they wish, they can designate a portion of that work to a church and pastor's council, along with a limit on what the council can do without bringing it before the body.
But Buck, YOU weren't behind in your payments, that congregation was.
It is strange to me, but I have witnessed many times a Brother, who is quite careful with his own money, be completely loose when it comes to spending someone else's money. If that council was wisely chosen, they would have dealt with this long ago.
If Paul were here today, he would tell us, "Look out from among you 7 men of honest report..." Then he would say, the seven with the best credit reports will do...
This entire thing is about money! The loss of this church, the loss of this pastor, every single bit of it! MONEY!
I don't want to hear the excuses, the economy, the loss of a good tither, none of it. Go before your congregation, or your council. Tell them you are no longer in the black, you are in the red. Do not hesitate. Change it. If you can find more funds, great. If you must make cuts, make them. But no man can tread water forever.
I don't know how long that church has been there, but if it existed back into the 50s or 60s, then this system used to be followed. It is still proscribed by the MINUTES. Ignoring them is disharmony and is not working. Stop it.
Is this fixable? Of course. There are men in that congregation who owe more than that $430k all by themselves who are paying their payments. Put them on the council. There are men whose net worth is several times that amount. Seek their wisdom. Use THEIR gift and calling.
If you are spending more than you have coming in, you will quickly drown. If you are barely treading water, you better lighten your load now. Any church, or any household, (your councilmen rule their house well, right?) that is spending every cent they have coming in is living above their means.
For goodness sakes, folks, this isn't hard. It is nothing but the simplest math.
So you are going to go independent and use the same men and the same system, and the church is going to prosper? You are kidding yourself. |
Very wise and good advise. Many folks within the church STILL think the pastor is the head of the church. He is not.
They speak of the pastor's vision etc. Christ is still the head folks, but sometimes WE forget that! If it is not Christs' vision we are wrong and will have division. We can have building programs, but unless He builds it we labor in vain. But WE forget that.
AB's are not the head, General overseers are not the head, state councils are not the head. Christ is!
So let us take a chapter from the early church that said, "it seemed good to the Holy Spirit and us." |
Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere Posts: 3382 7/5/13 12:03 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Silence Dogood |
| diakoneo wrote: | | So let us take a chapter from the early church that said, "it seemed good to the Holy Spirit and us." |
It would be great if headquarters would abide by that scripture by saying, " For it seemed good to the Holy Spirit, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things..." Instead, all we get is more greed, more lack of accountability, more bullying, more ministry cuts so the higher ups can keep their jobs, and more strangle holds.
Let Buck have his building. Let any other pastor and congregation who feels they no longer wish to be part of the COG their buildings and quit fostering disunity by forced servitude. _________________ "Without Freedom of Thought there can be no such Thing as Wisdom; and no such Thing as Public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech." -Benjamin Franklin, writing as Silence Dogood |
Member Posts: 46 7/5/13 1:29 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
SouthGeorgiaBoy |
| Silence Dogood wrote: | | diakoneo wrote: | | So let us take a chapter from the early church that said, "it seemed good to the Holy Spirit and us." |
It would be great if headquarters would abide by that scripture by saying, " For it seemed good to the Holy Spirit, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things..." Instead, all we get is more greed, more lack of accountability, more bullying, more ministry cuts so the higher ups can keep their jobs, and more strangle holds.
Let Buck have his building. Let any other pastor and congregation who feels they no longer wish to be part of the COG their buildings and quit fostering disunity by forced servitude. |
It was not and is not Buck's building (Buck didn't claim it was). I have done some investigating on this and found out that he had started an independent church there in Ennis several years ago after working with Tom Sterbens. Sometime later then AB Dan Bolin brought them into the Church of God and put them in that building. So why would the Church of God just hand the building over to them? |
Acts Enthusiast Posts: 1037 7/5/13 6:49 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
State Council |
Texicanii |
| If you have live in Texas long and been a member or pastor in the Church of God you the council controls the AB.Has been that way for years. When the same men rotate on the council all the time you know who's in charge. |
Friendly Face Posts: 153 7/5/13 11:34 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
Just think |
deskjet7 |
If the New Hope Church of God could in a short period of time, upon being notified that the pastor was going to be removed, then could rally together to pay current all the bills of the church, why did they not do this to remain in the location they were in in the first place?
Is the New Hope Church(minus the "of God") still responsible for the bank note/debt? Did the pastor sign that note? Trustees of the church? Was the loan in New Hope name or Ennis Church of God? It is obvious the note was underwritten by the state. That is why the AB was contacted. Now All of the Texas Church of God must pay for that loan because a church congregation decided that they were no longer going to and left it high and dry.
Another thing to think about. The bank could have at anytime called the full note due, especially since it had been in default for months. Anytime you are late on a loan payment, you are in default. It is at that banks discretion as to when and if to call that note due or not. This thing has been a ticking bomb for months. It finally exploded. Explosions are always destructive. Now we must see what has remained and what can be salvaged. Will there still be a Church of God in Ennis?
Now think about this. Most states have loans they have underwritten. If some of those large loans go into default, We, the Church of God will pay. To many of those will sink this great ship called the Church of God.
Maybe it is time for individual churches to stand on their own. No underwriting by the Church of God. If they make it, great. If not, well, hopefully that would not happen to to many. Let's fix this. |
Acts Enthusiast Posts: 1815 7/6/13 12:34 am

|
|
|
| |
 |
Let me also say |
deskjet7 |
| I would like to see this pastor and congregation stay with the Church of God. It is obvious that they have proven they can raise the funds and pay the bills. They just needed a reason. Or might we say a fire lit underneath them. It appears to me that that decision to stay was left in their court and they chose not to stay with the Church of God. They need to carefully reconsider this decision. |
Acts Enthusiast Posts: 1815 7/6/13 12:45 am

|
|
|
| |
 |
|
|