 |
Actscelerate.com
Open Any Time -- Day or Night
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Message |
Author |
 Re: (L) |
spartanfan |
I don't know because I'm not even sure who the Democratic nominee will be at this point. But I do know this - since the reason Trump will fall short will solely be because of political maneuvering to keep Kasich who has no possible route to the 1237 in the race long enough to keep Trump from totally winning all the northeast delegates and force a brokered convention. That's going to be considered a "foul" by any standards. The only way to hold the party together is to nominate who gets the most delegates going in at this point - no matter who that is! |
Golf Cart Mafia Underboss
Posts: 3638
3/27/16 8:02 pm
|
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
| Re: Changing rules mid-stream |
chestnut ridge |
| Resident Skeptic wrote: | Question for anti-Trump folks on here.
There is talk now that even if Trump secures the required number of delegates before the convention, that the rules will be changed at the convention to take the nomination away from Trump.
As much as some of you despise Trump, would you protest if this does happen? |
I haven't heard that......a brokered convention if Trump could not seal the deal with 1237 delegates
No I would not support a rule change |
Acts Enthusiast
Posts: 1722
3/27/16 8:30 pm
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
John Jett |
changing the rules mid-stream like insisting that you are the nominee if you don't have a majority? No I don't support that.
The rules are and have always been you must have a full majority to win, if not, its a whole other process which I will support. At this point I'm not even sure I would not support any effort to derail Trump even should he have the majority. I don't like him at all, will not vote for him, and no longer care if he is "treated fairly", he certainly doesn't treat anyone else fairly. |
Golf Cart Mafia Capo Famiglia
Posts: 4955
3/27/16 9:04 pm
|
|
|
| |
|
| Not controllable |
spartanfan |
| John Jett wrote: | changing the rules mid-stream like insisting that you are the nominee if you don't have a majority? No I don't support that.
The rules are and have always been you must have a full majority to win, if not, its a whole other process which I will support. At this point I'm not even sure I would not support any effort to derail Trump even should he have the majority. I don't like him at all, will not vote for him, and no longer care if he is "treated fairly", he certainly doesn't treat anyone else fairly. |
Anyone that cannot be controlled is rejected by the small group of men that control the government, news, finances, entertainment and education system of the country. If it's Herman Cain, Mike Huckabee, Pat Robertson, Ron Paul - as long as they can't control them enough to keep their agenda going of dismantling America from the inside out financially so we can be absorbed into the New World Order. I believe that Donald Trump is one they don't yet control. Do I like him? - no. Would I vote for him? - probably over whoever the Democrat is. Am I a supporter of him?- not yet. As of now I have no dog in this hunt (I supported Ben Carson). Trump is "Trump First - America Second" IMO but that's better than "Illuminati First" which is usually what the nominees of both parties are (and always the winner is). It will be interesting to see who the nominees are for both parties. We may all be surprised on both sides. But the way it's looking - the Democrat wins hands down no matter what kind of circus the Republicans put on. |
Golf Cart Mafia Underboss
Posts: 3638
3/28/16 8:39 am
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
