 |
Actscelerate.com Open Any Time -- Day or Night
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Message |
Author |
|
Dave Dorsey |
| c6thplayer1 wrote: | | Let me ask you something. If a neighbor mows your yard a trims it all real neat and tells you no charge I really just appreciate being your neighbor. Would you not want to do something nice for your neighbor? any decent person would and the same applies to marriage. And one who counts favors from another and just returns the same amount needs a little counseling. |
You said, in a beyond great marriage the wife is given a greater share. This is not true. In a beyond great marriage, each spouse has the same share -- 100%.
The husband may strive to give the wife a greater share, but as in your neighborly example, she will only then strive to do the same for him. If he strives to give her a greater share and she doesn't strive to reciprocate (or if she strives to give him a greater share and he doesn't strive to reciprocate) the marriage will not be great. He will be doing all he is responsible for (or she will be doing all she is responsible for) but let's not labor under the illusion that that marriage will be strong.
That kind of thing happens all the time, and in fact is exactly what this thread is about: a marriage where the wife only gave, and the husband only took. We need to encourage both genders to serve and sacrifice for the other. Had you said, "In a beyond great marriage, the husband treats the wife like a queen and the wife treats the husband like a king," you would have been correct. |
[Insert Acts Pun Here] Posts: 13654 3/10/16 12:34 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
|
|
Link |
| bonnie knox wrote: | | Quote: | | A Christian's response to abuse in marriage should not be to abandon the teaching of scripture on the role of husbands and wives. |
If the first response you have to someone who has been abused is to make sure they are fulfilling a prescribed role, you have a heart problem. |
And if you twist my response to your question about whether a husband should be able take his wife's keys and cell phone away, into making it look like I am pro-abuse, does that indicate that you have a heart-problem?
| Quote: |
If there is disagreement on what the Bible says about "roles," can't we at least agree that God's intent for marriage does not include abuse? |
Of course we can agree on that.
| Quote: | | You are judging those who don't interpret the Bible the same way you do as abandoning the teaching of scripture. |
Hmmm. I asked if we were in agreement that wives should submit to their husbands in everything. I used the wording from Ephesians. I was responding to a post about keys and cell phones after reading the first post in the thread. I mentioned in the last post that that was what I was responding to. _________________ Link |
Acts-perienced Poster Posts: 11849 3/10/16 1:02 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Link |
II Peter 2 deals with cases of domestic violence. I say domestic violence because slaves were typically domestic servants... in the home.
In that chapter, Peter deals with slaves or servants, rather than wives. Does Peter advise submission/subjection for the abused in these verses?
18 Servants, be subject to your masters with all fear; not only to the good and gentle, but also to the froward.
19 For this is thankworthy, if a man for conscience toward God endure grief, suffering wrongfully.
20 For what glory is it, if, when ye be buffeted for your faults, ye shall take it patiently? but if, when ye do well, and suffer for it, ye take it patiently, this is acceptable with God.
21 For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps:
22 Who did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth:
23 Who, when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, he threatened not; but committed himself to him that judgeth righteously:
24 Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed.
25 For ye were as sheep going astray; but are now returned unto the Shepherd and Bishop of your souls. _________________ Link
Last edited by Link on 3/10/16 1:28 pm; edited 1 time in total |
Acts-perienced Poster Posts: 11849 3/10/16 1:06 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
bonnie knox |
| So does that mean your pro-abuse? |
[Insert Acts Pun Here] Posts: 14803 3/10/16 1:13 pm

|
|
|
| |
 |
Re: hmmmm |
Link |
| wayne wrote: | If Ruth Tucker would have knocked that piece of garbage-great evangelist out early on she wouldn't have endured so many beatings. My momma would have taken everything she had to that man and I guarantee you it would have stopped. |
I saw your little 'evil' icons, so I assume you aren't actually endorsing this. I saw the trailer for the movie 'Enough' were Jennifer Lopez's character was an abused wife who presumably learned to fight and beat up her husband or her ex. Not really my kind of movie. There are so many 'revenge' movies, or elements of revenge in movies where the movie leads the audience to want to kill or beat up the bad guy.
Sometimes, the hero kills and maims half a dozen unimportant characters, but shows his nobility of soul by not killing the bad guy and turning him over to police.
The Bible says, 'Vengence is min, saith the Lord.' There are 'powers that be', like governors and agents of the state like policemen. There is also the local church, and the church should involve itself in church discipline where appropriate. I realize that is an almost unheard of thing among a lot of American Pentecostals, but it is Biblical.
If Papa is abusive, momma hitting papa in the head with a frying pan isn't the solution.
We all submit to the Lord first and foremost, and there is a time to expose the deeds of darkness.
I also think we need to realize, especially those in pastoral and counseling ministry, that it's possible for a husband (or wife) to be abusive, to repent, and to be transformed by the power of Jesus Christ. We should want to see marriages restored. Abuse doesn't cancel out the verses about submission either, and if there has been abuse in a marriage, when a marriage is healed, it needs to operate in accordance with the teaching of the New Testament.
Many people point out that divorce is not the unpardonable sin. Of course, it isn't. But neither is domestic abuse. God can even forgive rapists and child molesters. Child molesters are something that makes a lot of our blood boil, but God can forgive them and killers, too. _________________ Link |
Acts-perienced Poster Posts: 11849 3/10/16 1:14 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Link |
| bonnie knox wrote: | | So does that mean your pro-abuse? |
Of course not, Bonnie. Nothing I said could logically lead one to that conclusion.
You also spelled 'you're' as 'your'. I hope you can find forgiveness for your error.  _________________ Link |
Acts-perienced Poster Posts: 11849 3/10/16 1:15 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
Re: hmmmm |
bonnie knox |
I appreciate that you decry what was done to her as evil. However, perhaps without realizing what you've said, you are blaming the victim for "putting up with it." The victim should not be blamed.
As Tucker mentions in her writings, she felt certain that people would not believe her. This was back in the 1980's. Case after case has borne out the reality of that fear. It does seem that the culturally climate is changing somewhat with respect to believing victims, but it is not hard to find cases still where a victim is blamed or not believed.
Another issue is custody. Tucker waited until her son was 13 and was old enough to testify to the abuse. She had feared that if she had taken it to court before that, she might have lost custody of her son.
And no, it is by no means certain the elders would have removed the man from his position. First, they might not have believed her. Second, they might have just told her to try being more submissive.
And in fact, after she separated, she agreed to go with her husband to "Biblical" counseling. That was indeed what she was advised to do--try being more submissive!! |
[Insert Acts Pun Here] Posts: 14803 3/10/16 1:24 pm

|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Patrick Harris |
| bonnie knox wrote: | | So does that mean your pro-abuse? |
He may not be pro-abuse, but he's certainly OK with an abused wife staying with her husband and enduring that abuse. |
Acts Enthusiast Posts: 1323 3/10/16 1:31 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
bonnie knox |
Ha! I just saw that I had your. I must have started out the sentence going somewhere else. I started to go back to correct it, but alas, you had already caught it for me. I would have caught it in time, but for how long it took me to type my response to Wayne. This HP keyboard cuts and pastes the last thing on the clipboard every time I use a quotation mark which means I have to delete everything every time I use a quotation mark. It is also pasting everything whenever I type a capital H. So when I type that, I have to type h, control z. Everything takes forever. Also the insert function has me totally befuddled. Part of the time it overwrites corrections, part of the time it inserts.
However, contrary to how I'm often portrayed here, I'm not the grammar police. But, if you want to play that game, I can be very annoying with it.
| Link wrote: | | bonnie knox wrote: | | So does that mean your pro-abuse? |
Of course not, Bonnie. Nothing I said could logically lead one to that conclusion.
You also spelled 'you're' as 'your'. I hope you can find forgiveness for your error.  |
Last edited by bonnie knox on 3/10/16 1:43 pm; edited 1 time in total |
[Insert Acts Pun Here] Posts: 14803 3/10/16 1:33 pm

|
|
|
| |
 |
|
bonnie knox |
| Link wrote: | | Do you think it would be right for a husband to refuse to submit to her husband if he told her he wanted to hold her cell phone or car keys. |
Link, did you mean to say husband? |
[Insert Acts Pun Here] Posts: 14803 3/10/16 1:36 pm

|
|
|
| |
 |
|
bonnie knox |
| Quote: | | That's a pretty nasty thing to say, to paint me as justifying violence in marriage to justify violence. |
Did you mean to say violence twice? It's not making sense. |
[Insert Acts Pun Here] Posts: 14803 3/10/16 1:38 pm

|
|
|
| |
 |
|
bonnie knox |
| Quote: | | Who are you not in agreement with? |
It's 'whom.' With whom are you not in agreement? |
[Insert Acts Pun Here] Posts: 14803 3/10/16 1:41 pm

|
|
|
| |
 |
|
bonnie knox |
 |
[Insert Acts Pun Here] Posts: 14803 3/10/16 1:42 pm

|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Cojak |
I am not sure if this can be explained to everyone's satisfaction. For some reason we have grown to 'accept' someone is in charge. Men and women have been taught the man is in charge. If not by word, by actions and obvious outward actions.
I am not sure if anyone on this forum have been married longer than my wife and I, in 5 months it will be 60 years and we were married as teenagers.
The last 35 years we have had one of the BEST marriages EVER. It took a few years for me to realize she was as important to OUR success as I. Even in my ignorant years I was not dumb enough to see myself as 'her disciplinarian'. And on the other hand she has never refused my desires nor I hers, if the circumstances allowed it.(You might have to work that statement out)
WE are and have been a team and to be honest I spend a lot of time now trying to make up for the stupid years she put up with me.
Once TRUE LOVE is realized you do not have a lot of time to be selfish nor demanding.
I knew a certain COG preachers wife most of my life and thought she was happy. When he died she confided he was a tyrant, mean, abusive. They were married 55 years before his death. She married a wonderful layman who treated her as a loving spouse. She told me that she was the happiest she had ever been, married to a good church member and Christian.  _________________ Some facts but mostly just my opinion!
jacsher@aol.com
http://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/ |
01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011 Posts: 24285 3/10/16 1:58 pm

|
|
|
| |
 |
|
bonnie knox |
Cojak, I can't tell you how much I appreciate your posts. What you just did was what author Ruth Tucker wants to do--set aside the 'debate' and tell our stories.
Thanks. |
[Insert Acts Pun Here] Posts: 14803 3/10/16 2:05 pm

|
|
|
| |
 |
Link and Bonnie |
wayne |
| Have either of you been victim to abuse? Were you raised in an environment where this went on? |
Acts Enthusiast Posts: 1274 3/10/16 2:25 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
bonnie |
wayne |
| Why does everything turn into a grammar lesson? Are you that perfect that you have to point out the imperfections of others? |
Acts Enthusiast Posts: 1274 3/10/16 2:26 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
Re: hmmmm |
wayne |
[quote="bonnie knox"]I appreciate that you decry what was done to her as evil. However, perhaps without realizing what you've said, you are blaming the victim for "putting up with it." quote]
You never to cease to amaze with your assumptions. I feel sorry for this individual. I am sorry that she was in a "religious environment" that forced her to put up with this garbage. I am sorry that her 'Christian" husband thought it was his biblical duty to abuse his wife. I am sorry that her "Christian friends" didn't notice something was going on and then do something to assist her.
I assume by your response that you applaud her for staying in this abusive relationship? You think she did the right thing by allowing herself to endure multiple bouts of physical abuse?
"The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised," |
Acts Enthusiast Posts: 1274 3/10/16 2:45 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
Re: bonnie |
bonnie knox |
No, the background goes way back to when Eddie started a thread about 'your/you're.'
It's like a running joke.
I was just pointing out to Link that I could, if I wanted to, be annoying about the grammar stuff. I get tired of the insinuation that I routinely point out the grammar errors I see. The only way I know to show that I don't do that is to give a taste of what it would look like if I did.
| wayne wrote: | | Why does everything turn into a grammar lesson? Are you that perfect that you have to point out the imperfections of others? |
|
[Insert Acts Pun Here] Posts: 14803 3/10/16 3:24 pm

|
|
|
| |
 |
Re: hmmmm |
bonnie knox |
I assumed nothing.
Wayne, you suggested she shouldn't have put up with it as if it were in her power to choose not to. You are suggesting that she could have stopped the abuse by fighting back.
What this says (whether intentionally or unintentionally) is that it is the victim's fault for not physically fighting back.
| Quote: | If Ruth Tucker would have knocked that piece of garbage-great evangelist out early on she wouldn't have endured so many beatings. My momma would have taken everything she had to that man and I guarantee you it would have stopped....
|
Why are you asking if I applaud her for staying?
| wayne wrote: |
You never to cease to amaze with your assumptions. I feel sorry for this individual. I am sorry that she was in a "religious environment" that forced her to put up with this garbage. I am sorry that her 'Christian" husband thought it was his biblical duty to abuse his wife. I am sorry that her "Christian friends" didn't notice something was going on and then do something to assist her.
I assume by your response that you applaud her for staying in this abusive relationship? You think she did the right thing by allowing herself to endure multiple bouts of physical abuse?
"The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised," |
|
[Insert Acts Pun Here] Posts: 14803 3/10/16 3:33 pm

|
|
|
| |
 |
|
|