| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Message |
Author |
 What??? Moore accuser wrote yearbook inscription herself?(L) |
Nature Boy Florida |
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
| |
UncleJD |
already covered this in the other thread but yeah, everything she said was true, except the evidence she gave, which was false, everything she has no evidence for is still true.  |
Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere
Posts: 3147
12/8/17 3:39 pm
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Cojak |
Like it or not lady, there goes credibility. But all she wanted to do was cement some facts.
You cannot beat Newt's insight, "Lynch mobs'. trial by accusations. No facing the accuser etc. I hope Moore gets in, but that is me with no vote...
_________________
Some facts but mostly just my opinion!
jacsher@aol.com
http://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/ |
01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011
Posts: 24285
12/8/17 8:23 pm
|
|
|
| |
|
| This is not actually something new and shocking |
bonnie knox |
The inscription is not a "forgery." The inscription is Roy Moore's inscription and the notes at the bottom are Nelson's.
I wrote this three weeks ago:
| Quote: | If I were someone's lawyer, I wouldn't either (though as I stated in another thread, choosing Allred--and please, just because you don't like her, don't make fun of her name--does NOT lend credence to a client's claim of this being apolitical).
I thought even before someone else brought it up, that the name of the restaurant was probably added by someone else. I don't know if the signature was added by someone else. I do notice that Moore's written statement says it has been "tampered with." That is different than standing by his claim that he never signed her yearbook at all.
But if I were a lawyer, I would have no way of knowing what turning the yearbook over would reveal, so it would be in the best interest of my client to NOT do it. It would make no difference whether I thought it was authentic or not. Besides that, (just to play the devil's advocate), suppose the assault happened as Nelson described, suppose Moore had indeed signed her yearbook with the inscription, though not the printing of the initials "D.A.," date, and restaurant. If I were a lawyer and had a good case based on everything else, why would I risk sabotaging my case if it turned out those were details added to the yearbook by someone else. And I can easily see someone added a notation of the place after someone signed her yearbook. |
So was Moore also lying when he claimed never to have signed the yearbook at all? |
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 14803
12/9/17 12:35 am
|
|
|
| |
|
| Re: What??? Moore accuser wrote yearbook inscription herself?(L) |
chestnut ridge |
So what part was fake? |
Acts Enthusiast
Posts: 1722
12/9/17 11:06 am
|
|
|
| |
|
| Re: What??? Moore accuser wrote yearbook inscription herself?(L) |
Nature Boy Florida |
| chestnut ridge wrote: |
So what part was fake? |
According to the accuser - his signature.
Not sure how the rest of it was him - except his signature. Guess he was anonymous until she corrected the document.
_________________
Whether you like it or not, learn to love it, because its the best thing going today! |
Acts-pert Poster
Posts: 16646
12/10/17 12:14 pm
|
|
|
| |
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
