I did not think it was a "weak" agenda, per se. I dealt with a lot of items that were deemed by some to be "minutia/minutiae" (word of the week), but I viewed it as an attempt to clean up a lot of archaic practices (mailouts, etc) and wording to fit the minutes with much of what is commonplace practice anyway (that doesn't apply to every measure, but many).
I would love situations like that to be handled by the Executive Council anyway, so as to avoid the necessity of dealing with that in the General Council, but as it currently stands, IMO, the Executive Council was right to bring those items before us. Otherwise they could have been accused of over stepping their bounds. I have heard that much of the agenda is driven by motion suggestions from ministers outside the Executive Council anyway. If that is indeed true, it says a lot about our ability as ministers to drive the agenda; it doesn't sound like its being controlled and stifled. |
Friendly Face Posts: 198 1/18/16 12:08 pm
|