Actscelerate.com Forum Index Actscelerate.com
Open Any Time -- Day or Night
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
r/Actscelerate
Browse by what's: hot | new | rising | top of the week

The Hard liners and softer lines have always been with us.

 
   Actscelerate.com Forum Index -> Acts-Celerate Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Message Author
Post The Hard liners and softer lines have always been with us. Cojak
What some call 'Hard liners' today would have been considered moderate even liberal in the 1950's.

My dad lived the hard line but did not preach it. When 'cuff links' became popular and he made a mistake of buying a dress shirt that required them, he had mama put two buttons together. He refused to wear a 'tie tack or tie pin' he always used a safety pin from the rear of the tie. His reason? IF we are against jewelry, I will not wear it. He never preached that. I asked him later when I was trying to preach, he said, "No need to run folk off before they have a chance to get saved."

Many of our churches have 'fallen off', losing some old folk in attendance, because we are allowing sins (?) like 'movies, jewelry, and pants on ladies in church. Some even still reject the TV (at times for good reason).

I do sympathize with some of these people because they sat under some of the most hard lined pastors in the COG. right or wrong they were endoctrinated (brain washed?) with a constant diet of DO NOT! Some fo the stands were actually not BAD! But they did raise a few nay=sayers who caused lots of good preachers a very hard time.

I could name a few names from the 50's but there is no need now. These guys were over the top with Holiness (my way) or Hell.

I am thankful for my dad's life. He did have one fault as a pastor. If he had one member (tithe payer or not) who thought TV was a sin ther would be none in the parsonage. So in my time in a parsonage we never had a TV, I watched it at the memebers houses. LOL

Do you remember when TV was a sin?

In your life time how have you changed, becoming more liberal than your youth? Embarassed
_________________
Some facts but mostly just my opinion!
jacsher@aol.com
http://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/
01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011
Posts: 24285
11/21/17 11:57 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Re: The Hard liners and softer lines have always been with us. UncleJD
Cojak wrote:


Do you remember when TV was a sin?

In your life time how have you changed, becoming more liberal than your youth? Embarassed



To the first question, I don't think legalism (extra-Biblical "holiness"), is the same as being orthodox and conservative. I think orthodox Biblical belief is what is considered "hard line" today. (such as a belief in a real Jesus, a real heaven, and a real hell).

I have become much more conservative in my older age both spiritually and politically (in that I believe in a more narrow interpretation of both the Bible, and our country's Constitution), but to some on this board, I would be considered "liberal" in some ways in that I don't agree with their extra-biblical/legalistic positions on certain subjects (and have both scripture and about 2000 years of historical practice to back it up).
Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere
Posts: 3147
11/21/17 1:30 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Re: The Hard liners and softer lines have always been with us. Cojak
UncleJD wrote:
...

To the first question, I don't think legalism (extra-Biblical "holiness"), is the same as being orthodox and conservative. I think orthodox Biblical belief is what is considered "hard line" today. (such as a belief in a real Jesus, a real heaven, and a real hell).

...


I certainly agree JD, But for folk who were sujected to that teaching of 'extra-Biblical "holiness"', week after week for years makes it hard for them to desern the 'extra' or Pharisee attitude. Of course people of my generation and before are fast disappearing and I am positive God is a good judge.

I have only attended a couple of what are called 'mega churches' one seemed too wild for me, the other felt comfortable as far as truth. And iot did do me good to think this many folk are interested in Jesus, but I fit better in the smaller churches .
_________________
Some facts but mostly just my opinion!
jacsher@aol.com
http://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/
01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011
Posts: 24285
11/21/17 3:39 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Re: The Hard liners and softer lines have always been with us. Cojak
UncleJD wrote:
...

To the first question, I don't think legalism (extra-Biblical "holiness"), is the same as being orthodox and conservative. I think orthodox Biblical belief is what is considered "hard line" today. (such as a belief in a real Jesus, a real heaven, and a real hell).

...


I certainly agree JD, But for folk who were sujected to that teaching of 'extra-Biblical "holiness"', week after week for years makes it hard for them to desern the 'extra' or Pharisee attitude. Of course people of my generation and before are fast disappearing and I am positive God is a good judge.

I have only attended a couple of what are called 'mega churches' one seemed too wild for me, the other felt comfortable as far as truth. And iot did do me good to think this many folk are interested in Jesus, but I fit better in the smaller churches . Embarassed
_________________
Some facts but mostly just my opinion!
jacsher@aol.com
http://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/
01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011
Posts: 24285
11/21/17 3:40 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Cojak... Aaron Scott
Oh, the memories. Like your dad, my dad was not at all a clothesline preacher (which doesn't mean that he didn't occasionally mention the need for modest dress--especially if a style was creeping into the church that threatened to cross the line).

I didn't even know long sleeves for men was a "thing" until I came home from school one day and my sister pointed out that dad was wearing short sleeves. I started crying! Later my dad told me some important things...

He said that, when he was evangelizing, he purposed to try not to do anything that would disqualify him from preaching anywhere. Because he and my mother dressed quite conservatively, doors to some "holiness gold standard" churches were opened to him. He couldn't have preached there at all if he and my mother wore wedding bands, tie clasps, etc. In fact, I don't even recall my mother wearing a brooch. I have a picture of my dad FISHING on a pier...with a tie on. Ha!

The point was, as my father told me, there were things he did out of love and respect for some very good men who were very conservative. He could have stayed busy without revivals in those churches, but he wanted to be able to go anywhere the Lord opened the door. He didn't preach hard or harsh messages on dress or "worldliness"--at least in what was often called "worldliness." Yet some of those very strict churches would have him back over and over for revival.

He wore long sleeves NOT because he was convicted about it, but because there were some who felt that men ought to wear long sleeves...and so he did his best not to offend. Today, we would roll our eyes at such a thing. Most today, I think, would say "If they don't like how I dress, tough!" But that was just not how my dad operated.

He got to go to some really great churches--uber-conservative and even what was then probably deemed "loose" or "liberal." He made many friends from across the spectrum--I'm sure the conservatives liked him at least in part because he dressed "right," and the liberals probably liked him because he wasn't a harsh or clothesline preacher.

When he explained that, I began to understand better.
Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology
Posts: 6042
11/21/17 4:29 pm


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Post Re: Cojak... Cojak
Aaron Scott wrote:
Oh, the memories. Like your dad, my dad was not at all a clothesline preacher (which doesn't mean that he didn't occasionally mention the need for modest dress--especially if a style was creeping into the church that threatened to cross the line).

I didn't even know long sleeves for men was a "thing" until I came home from school one day and my sister pointed out that dad was wearing short sleeves. I started crying! Later my dad told me some important things...

He said that, when he was evangelizing, he purposed to try not to do anything that would disqualify him from preaching anywhere. Because he and my mother dressed quite conservatively, doors to some "holiness gold standard" churches were opened to him. He couldn't have preached there at all if he and my mother wore wedding bands, tie clasps, etc. In fact, I don't even recall my mother wearing a brooch. I have a picture of my dad FISHING on a pier...with a tie on. Ha!

The point was, as my father told me, there were things he did out of love and respect for some very good men who were very conservative. He could have stayed busy without revivals in those churches, but he wanted to be able to go anywhere the Lord opened the door. He didn't preach hard or harsh messages on dress or "worldliness"--at least in what was often called "worldliness." Yet some of those very strict churches would have him back over and over for revival.

He wore long sleeves NOT because he was convicted about it, but because there were some who felt that men ought to wear long sleeves...and so he did his best not to offend. Today, we would roll our eyes at such a thing. Most today, I think, would say "If they don't like how I dress, tough!" But that was just not how my dad operated.

He got to go to some really great churches--uber-conservative and even what was then probably deemed "loose" or "liberal." He made many friends from across the spectrum--I'm sure the conservatives liked him at least in part because he dressed "right," and the liberals probably liked him because he wasn't a harsh or clothesline preacher.

When he explained that, I began to understand better.


I just told my wife you described my dad better than I could have. THANKS.
I do appreciate men like your dad. I remember those, although I would have preferred dad to be a Baptist preacher most of my growing up, as I grew older and older he looked better and better. (I wouild have settled for Methodist! LOL)
_________________
Some facts but mostly just my opinion!
jacsher@aol.com
http://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/
01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011
Posts: 24285
11/21/17 7:21 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Cojak
I used the question, 'Do you remember when TV was a sin?' as an example. Of course I never thought it was a sin as a youngster. But once on my first trip 'away from my life time pastor (dad)', I sat under a hard liner. He was a man of God of course, so I was so convinced he was right I sold our TV and gave the money to the church.

I was convinced if a woman 'cut/trimmed' her hair she had sinned. We were married 30 years before I bought my wife a wedding ring. I could go on and on. School sports were a sin. etc.

Since I have been there I know how some folk can still hold those 'legalistic' teachings JD referred to. I guess what I was asking is how many still remember those time. I am glad they are mostly gone, or at least I can chose to attend a church that is more 'biblical' in their basic beliefs without being 'blackballed'.

Now it ain't my cup of tea, the smoke, dimmed lights black ceilings etc, but I must admit I looked around when I visited and saw some real tears, dedicated worship by young people as the Word was delivered. I thanked God these young folk were worshiping. Smile Smile
_________________
Some facts but mostly just my opinion!
jacsher@aol.com
http://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/
01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011
Posts: 24285
11/21/17 11:46 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Re: The Hard liners and softer lines have always been with us. bradfreeman
Cojak wrote:
In your life time how have you changed, becoming more liberal than your youth? Embarassed


Great observations. Change is vital. Repentance means change. The word "disciple" (Gr. mathetes) means to be a learner. If we aren't learning and changing, we're moving in the wrong direction. Our learning and change should be bringing about more and more FREEDOM, FAITH, LOVE and LIFE. BONDAGE, FEAR, MEANNESS and DYING are exactly what Jesus came to redeem us from. So I enjoy much more freedom now than I did when I was younger. I give people more freedom too!

To the pure, all things are pure; but to those who are defiled and unbelieving, nothing is pure, but both their mind and their conscience are defiled. Tit. 1:15
_________________
I'm not saved because I'm good. I'm saved because He's good!

My website: www.bradfreeman.com
My blog: http://bradcfreeman.tumblr.com/
Acts-dicted
Posts: 9027
11/22/17 9:56 am


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Post Old Time Country Preacher
Cojak wrote:
smoke, dimmed lights black ceilings etc


What is this place, a masonic lodge?
Acts-pert Poster
Posts: 15570
11/22/17 9:20 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Cojak
Old Time Country Preacher wrote:
Cojak wrote:
smoke, dimmed lights black ceilings etc


What is this place, a masonic lodge?


I was told it was a church, seemed like it was with a little twist.

Never been in a Masonic Lodge, no one would ever invite me, never knowed why!

I had a friend, COG Evangelist, who was a lodge member, he was a little strange come to think of it. Embarassed
_________________
Some facts but mostly just my opinion!
jacsher@aol.com
http://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/
01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011
Posts: 24285
11/22/17 9:44 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post bonnie knox
Hey, Ole Timer, 'cordin to Flat and Scruggs, dim lights, thick smoke, and loud, loud music were the characteristics of the "club down the street" what lured the woman who just would never make a wife to a home-lovin man.

Old Time Country Preacher wrote:
Cojak wrote:
smoke, dimmed lights black ceilings etc


What is this place, a masonic lodge?
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 14803
11/22/17 10:57 pm


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Post Cojak
[quote="bonnie knox"]Hey, Ole Timer, 'cordin to Flat and Scruggs, dim lights, thick [b]smoke, and loud, loud music were the characteristics of the "club down the street" what lured the woman who just would never make a wife to a home-lovin man.[/b]

Old Time Country Preacher wrote:
Cojak wrote:
smoke, dimmed lights black ceilings etc


What is this place, a masonic lodge?
[/quote]

Shocked Shocked I'm going to bed on that, NITE! Embarassed
_________________
Some facts but mostly just my opinion!
jacsher@aol.com
http://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/
01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011
Posts: 24285
11/23/17 12:43 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Actscelerate.com Forum Index -> Acts-Celerate Post new topic   Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Acts-celerate Terms of Use | Acts-celerate Policy
Contact the Administrator.


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group :: Spelling by SpellingCow.