Actscelerate.com Forum Index Actscelerate.com
Open Any Time -- Day or Night
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
r/Actscelerate
Browse by what's: hot | new | rising | top of the week

I thought the Church had settled the gay question nature/nurture

 
   Actscelerate.com Forum Index -> Acts-Celerate Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Message Author
Post I thought the Church had settled the gay question nature/nurture UncleJD
I guess I was wrong as some of our posters take it as fact that people are born gay or "don't choose" their sexual preference (I don't say "orientation"). Is that where we are again? I don't see a belief in a sovereign, merciful and just God as compatible with the idea that He would force homosexuality on someone. Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere
Posts: 3147
10/30/17 8:54 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Re: I thought the Church had settled the gay question nature/nurture Mat
UncleJD wrote:
I guess I was wrong as some of our posters take it as fact that people are born gay or "don't choose" their sexual preference (I don't say "orientation"). Is that where we are again? I don't see a belief in a sovereign, merciful and just God as compatible with the idea that He would force homosexuality on someone.


Help me out with some context, when you say "the Church" are you using it in the broader Evangelical since (born-again believers) or in the denominational since, as in Churches of God (Cleveland, TN)? So, who is where again on this issues? What statement are you addressing?

Mat
Acts Enthusiast
Posts: 1994
10/30/17 9:33 am


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Reply with quote
Post Re: I thought the Church had settled the gay question nature/nurture bonnie knox
The church can decide that homosexual behavior is wrong, but the church can't "decide" that sexual preference is a matter of simply "nurture" if there are in fact other factors involved.
To say God wouldn't allow someone to be born with a same sex attraction would be like saying God wouldn't allow a man to be born with a propensity for promiscuity or that God wouldn't allow someone to be born with a genetic anomaly.

UncleJD wrote:
I guess I was wrong as some of our posters take it as fact that people are born gay or "don't choose" their sexual preference (I don't say "orientation"). Is that where we are again? I don't see a belief in a sovereign, merciful and just God as compatible with the idea that He would force homosexuality on someone.
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 14803
10/30/17 11:47 am


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Post Re: I thought the Church had settled the gay question nature/nurture UncleJD
bonnie knox wrote:
The church can decide that homosexual behavior is wrong, but the church can't "decide" that sexual preference is a matter of simply "nurture" if there are in fact other factors involved.
To say God wouldn't allow someone to be born with a same sex attraction would be like saying God wouldn't allow a man to be born with a propensity for promiscuity or that God wouldn't allow someone to be born with a genetic anomaly.


Actually, man is born with the capacity to sin in any way possible. However, that does not mean he was born to sin in a certain way. The "nurture" position, as I understand it and believe it, is that a child is born neutral and learns his or her behavior from cues given either overtly or covertly from parents, siblings, society, circumstances, and events. The other side, "nature" says we're born with a sexual orientation. I don't believe that, and I'm pretty sure the Church as a whole does not (or did not until recently).
Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere
Posts: 3147
10/30/17 11:54 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post bonnie knox
Would it mess up your theology if we found out there is a biological (say pre-birth exposure to agricultural chemicals or to hormones) component or a genetic component to same sex attraction?
I'm told that some Christians once believed the earth was flat.
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 14803
10/30/17 12:01 pm


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Post Quiet Wyatt
I think the Augustinian concept of an inherited ‘sinful nature’ which causes one to sin (aka ‘Original Sin’) certainly fits well with the liberal, modern idea of people being ‘born gay.’

My own view happens to be more in line with the church fathers prior to Augustine, as well as the historic Eastern branches of Christianity, all of which maintain the basic idea of human freewill contra Augustinian Manichean determinism.
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 12817
10/30/17 12:05 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Quiet Wyatt
Biological, chemical or hormonal effects during gestation can certainly affect the mental and physical development of babies before they are born; e.g., fetal alcohol syndrome, crack babies, etc. That would of course be of a different category altogether from the idea that God created someone with behavioral issues or gayness originally built in. [Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 12817
10/30/17 12:10 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Chicago27
Do you want to deal with effeminates too? There are many in our church and they were born that way. The Bible has something to say about them and we pass it off. Friendly Face
Posts: 253
10/30/17 12:17 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post UncleJD
bonnie knox wrote:

I'm told that some Christians once believed the earth was flat.


Great reduction!


bonnie knox wrote:
Would it mess up your theology if we found out there is a biological (say pre-birth exposure to agricultural chemicals or to hormones) component or a genetic component to same sex attraction?


A. chemicals would be an external/environmental cause
B. I don't expect a genetic cause, maybe a pre-disposition (which is different).
Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere
Posts: 3147
10/30/17 1:06 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Da Sheik
I’ll be honest and admit I don’t have it all figured out. I know what the Bible says about the sinfulness of the lifestyle, but as to the origins of said behavior I’m not settled. It would not shatter my faith to learn that some may be born with those tendencies due to genetic abnormalities. I think sometimes we feel such a strong need to “defend God”. Acts Enthusiast
Posts: 1865
10/30/17 2:14 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post sheepdogandy
Every human being is born with a genetic predisposition for an obsessive behavior that the Bible defines as sin.

It is related to us in the context of "the flesh".

Everybody's got something they can't control through the power of their will.

It requires the grace of God to overcome.

It is a scientific fact. Shocked
_________________
Charles A. Hutchins
Senior Pastor SPWC
Congregational Church of God

www.spwc.church
Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology
Posts: 7307
10/30/17 2:22 pm


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Reply with quote
Post Cojak
I like the black and white, I mean Yes and No questions. When the answers go GREY it confuses us old folk. I believe it is a CHOICE now the reasons for that choice in my mind is u for grabs.

Lots of stuff I don't know, most of the things brought up in comments I do/did not know. I am glad it is not my decision to make for everyone. OUCH!

Now Dasheik has just said:
I think sometimes we feel such a strong need to “defend God”.

Man is that a mouthful for chewing. Thanks man!

_________________
Some facts but mostly just my opinion!
jacsher@aol.com
http://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/
01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011
Posts: 24285
10/30/17 2:23 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Da Sheik
Cojak wrote:


Man is that a mouthful for chewing. Thanks man![/b]


I came to this conclusion some years ago when talking w another minister about another biblical topic. There are some very complex issues in life. Not only the homosexual issue. What about children born into Islamic families in the Middle East who seemingly have overwhelming impediments to ever hearing the Gospel? I know what the standard response is supposed to be. What about people born with both types of genitalia?
Acts Enthusiast
Posts: 1865
10/30/17 2:49 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Actscelerate.com Forum Index -> Acts-Celerate Post new topic   Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Acts-celerate Terms of Use | Acts-celerate Policy
Contact the Administrator.


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group :: Spelling by SpellingCow.