 |
Actscelerate.com Open Any Time -- Day or Night
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Message |
Author |
Changing rules mid-stream |
Resident Skeptic |
Question for anti-Trump folks on here.
There is talk now that even if Trump secures the required number of delegates before the convention, that the rules will be changed at the convention to take the nomination away from Trump.
As much as some of you despise Trump, would you protest if this does happen? _________________ "It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI |
Acts-dicted Posts: 8065 3/26/16 9:06 pm
|
|
| |
 |
|
Won't happen |
spartanfan |
It would be the end of the Republican Party as we know it. Enough people would just stay home and not vote to automatically give the election to the Dems in protest. The problem is that the whole deal is people are sick of politics as usual - and that would be the picture of what everyone is rejecting. A new party would emerge - the anti-establishment party. The Tea Party  |
Golf Cart Mafia Underboss Posts: 3638 3/26/16 9:22 pm
|
|
| |
 |
Re: Won't happen |
Resident Skeptic |
spartanfan wrote: | It would be the end of the Republican Party as we know it. Enough people would just stay home and not vote to automatically give the election to the Dems in protest. The problem is that the whole deal is people are sick of politics as usual - and that would be the picture of what everyone is rejecting. A new party would emerge - the anti-establishment party. The Tea Party  |
I think the GOP establishment wants all Tea Party types to leave the party. The elite will gladly go back to being a 35% share holder if it means they get to keep the perks. _________________ "It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI |
Acts-dicted Posts: 8065 3/26/16 9:27 pm
|
|
| |
 |
|
c6thplayer1 |
I cant stand trump but if the GOP did that I might go full bore democrat. |
Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology Posts: 6385 3/26/16 9:33 pm

|
|
| |
 |
|
Resident Skeptic |
c6thplayer1 wrote: | I cant stand trump but if the GOP did that I might go full bore democrat. |
Why would you essentially join the Communists? _________________ "It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI |
Acts-dicted Posts: 8065 3/26/16 10:03 pm
|
|
| |
 |
|
c6thplayer1 |
Resident Skeptic wrote: | c6thplayer1 wrote: | I cant stand trump but if the GOP did that I might go full bore democrat. |
Why would you essentially join the Communists? |
I wont , but why would the GOP act like a communist? |
Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology Posts: 6385 3/26/16 10:33 pm

|
|
| |
 |
|
BromptonFalls |
Trump is ridiculous. We all know what he is! He is an egotistical bully that did well in business and has had a good run in tabloid magazines and reality tv.
Does he really represent your ideas and the ideology of America?
He uses filthy language, is misogynistic, is the definition of greedy and self indulgent, is mean spirited and simply does not have the moral fiber I look for in a leader. He claims to be a Christian. I certainly don't not want to judge his faith or His personal relationship with Jesus. However, if "by their fruits we will know them", do we see any of the fruits of the Spirit operating in his life?
Love
Joy
Peace
Patience
Kindness
Goodness
Faithfulness
Gentleness
Self Control
Seriously.. Follow his speeches, tweets, interviews, and rallies for the last 8 months and tell me does this man have the qualities of a leader? Would he truly represent you?
Truthfully, I wouldn't want him teaching my kids in school. Nor would I want him coaching my kids in little league. I wouldn't want him to be my boss. I don't see myself being able to follow a man like that. Would you? I don't care if he has been a successful businessman.
I can't see him as the Leader of the Free World. Can you? _________________ Beautiful weather we're having |
Hey, DOC Posts: 71 3/26/16 10:41 pm
|
|
| |
 |
|
Resident Skeptic |
BromptonFalls wrote: | Trump is ridiculous. We all know what he is! He is an egotistical bully that did well in business and has had a good run in tabloid magazines and reality tv.
Does he really represent your ideas and the ideology of America?
He uses filthy language, is misogynistic, is the definition of greedy and self indulgent, is mean spirited and simply does not have the moral fiber I look for in a leader. He claims to be a Christian. I certainly don't not want to judge his faith or His personal relationship with Jesus. However, if "by their fruits we will know them", do we see any of the fruits of the Spirit operating in his life?
Love
Joy
Peace
Patience
Kindness
Goodness
Faithfulness
Gentleness
Self Control
Seriously.. Follow his speeches, tweets, interviews, and rallies for the last 8 months and tell me does this man have the qualities of a leader? Would he truly represent you?
Truthfully, I wouldn't want him teaching my kids in school. Nor would I want him coaching my kids in little league. I wouldn't want him to be my boss. I don't see myself being able to follow a man like that. Would you? I don't care if he has been a successful businessman.
I can't see him as the Leader of the Free World. Can you? |
Why are you trying to hijack this thread? Please answer the simple questioned asked in the OP. _________________ "It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI |
Acts-dicted Posts: 8065 3/26/16 11:03 pm
|
|
| |
 |
|
Cojak |
All that ranting my friend and the nomination is not as yet. ?But you can say a lot of terrible things about Trump, and I will agree with a lot, but one thing he is not is Hillary. I hear this a lot, "Anyone But Trump!" I am not saying it, but I sorta feel it, "Anyone but Hillary!"
Methinks RS is upset as he made this post. But I do not think even the GOP leaders are this stupid, BUT THEN who knows?
There is one thing I have and that is HOPE!  _________________ Some facts but mostly just my opinion!
jacsher@aol.com
http://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/ |
01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011 Posts: 24285 3/26/16 11:07 pm

|
|
| |
 |
|
BromptonFalls |
Quote: | Why are you trying to hijack this thread? Please answer the simple questioned asked in the OP. |
My apologies, sir. In hindsight, I should have started a new post.
To answer the original post of wether or not I would protest: I probably would not protest. I really don't know who I would protest to. I wouldn't necessarily like it, but I can't say that it would surprise me either. _________________ Beautiful weather we're having |
Hey, DOC Posts: 71 3/27/16 5:25 am
|
|
| |
 |
Not a Trump guy.... |
spartanfan |
I am not actively supporting anyone at this point. My man (Carson) has dropped out. Having said that - I remember at the beginning of the Republican debates that the moderators were insisting that everyone on stage make a statement committing their self to supporting whoever "won the nomination." Trump at first said something like, "I'll have to wait and see who it is" and everyone got upset because he didn't appear to be a team player and if he got out-voted he would take his toys and go home and throw the election to the Democrats.
The outcry to support who got the most votes no matter what was so great that they came back the next debate and asked again and this time Trump caved and said he would support whoever got the most votes, as did every other candidate including Cruz, Rubio and Kasich.
So my problem with the GOP is now that it appears that they (we - me included) are not going to get one of their guys in, they are willing to divide the party and through scheming and back-room agreements steal the party nomination for an "establishment" cooperating candidate. They wanted everyone to agree to "accept" who they could control and now that it looks like they are losing - they are willing to trash this election and try again in 4 years. It's all about "control by the establishment" as far as I can see.
I do not support Trump but I think Kasich is staying in only to keep Trump from getting strong enough support in the northeast (where Cruz fails miserably) to win the needed delegates to get the nomination on the first ballot. It looks like political corruption and maneuvering at its worst since every other candidate with no clear path to the 1237 has dropped out - only the one who can stop Trump and force a brokered convention stays in because they fear Trump vs. Cruz the rest of the way means Trump wins. They are choosing to "take their toys and go home" instead of allowing the people to choose between the only 2 candidates left with a clear path to the 1237.
I am not a Trump supporter but this looks to me like now since they are not getting their way - they are reneging on what they forced Trump to agree upon at the start. If Trump has the most delegates going into the convention and they renege and steal it from him then Hillary will win and the Republican establishment will try again in 4 years and the Republican party as we know it will cease to exist because millions of people will go independent.
I am not a Trump fan but this needs to go Trump vs Cruz the rest of the way and if it doesn't then whoever has the most delegates going in deserves the nomination. Fair is fair. If you make everyone pledge to support the winner then play it fair boys - whoever wins the most going in is your guy - no matter which one of the 17 it turns out to be. Even if it's the biggest narcissist on the stage. |
Golf Cart Mafia Underboss Posts: 3638 3/27/16 7:09 am
|
|
| |
 |
|
c6thplayer1 |
Quote: | millions of people will go independent. |
A better Idea .. I'll follow that one. |
Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology Posts: 6385 3/27/16 8:14 am

|
|
| |
 |
|
bonnie knox |
Quote: | The outcry to support who got the most votes no matter what was so great that they came back the next debate and asked again and this time Trump caved and said he would support whoever got the most votes, as did every other candidate including Cruz, Rubio and Kasich. |
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe they pledged to support the candidate "with the most votes." I believe they pledged to support the candidate who became the Republican nominee.
Kasich may stay in if he likes, that is not breaking rules. If no nominee has 1237 delegates, an open convention follows, and that is unusual, but not against the rules.
Certain convention rules will be made by the delegates, and I suppose there could be a case made that those rules ought not to change every 4 years. |
[Insert Acts Pun Here] Posts: 14803 3/27/16 1:25 pm

|
|
| |
 |
|
revuriah |
Despise Trump? Please, RS, don't put heart motivations like hatred into this. This is about his character. His character is far out of step with my values and yours.
However, if he gets to the magic number of 1237, yes, he should be the nominee. I won't vote for him, but he should get the nomination. If he only has a plurality, it should be contested. The establishment should not try to move the goal post, though. _________________ The World As I See It
http://worldjeffreysees.blogspot.com/
Revuriah's Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/people/Jeff-Richard/1226257444
Jeffrey David Richard's Myspace Music
www.myspace.com/547856946 |
Golf Cart Mafia Underboss Posts: 3682 3/27/16 2:55 pm

|
|
| |
 |
I know what I thought (and from people I've talked to and listened to... they thought it too...) |
spartanfan |
bonnie knox wrote: | Quote: | The outcry to support who got the most votes no matter what was so great that they came back the next debate and asked again and this time Trump caved and said he would support whoever got the most votes, as did every other candidate including Cruz, Rubio and Kasich. |
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe they pledged to support the candidate "with the most votes." I believe they pledged to support the candidate who became the Republican nominee.
Kasich may stay in if he likes, that is not breaking rules. If no nominee has 1237 delegates, an open convention follows, and that is unusual, but not against the rules.
Certain convention rules will be made by the delegates, and I suppose there could be a case made that those rules ought not to change every 4 years. |
There are ways to justify the back-room maneuvering and under the table deals but in the spirit of "whoever wins the most" I think we all understand the implications of what they were pledging to. I am not a Trump fan but if he has the most going in - then he deserves it, especially since they are doing everything they can to stop him. Some establishment Senators who have been anti-Cruz forever are now saying they will support him just to keep Trump for winning enough delegates. Then when they get to the convention - try to get Paul Ryan in, who didn't even make it to the 2nd round of the fight. I'm just saying - a lot of the Trump people will feel ripped off if they don't give him the nomination if he leads all going into the convention. They will not back another Republican, if they continue this charade. |
Golf Cart Mafia Underboss Posts: 3638 3/27/16 2:58 pm
|
|
| |
 |
|
bonnie knox |
spartanfan, having a plurality is not a majority, and, no, Trump does not 'deserve' to win if he does not have a majority (i.e. 50% + 1, which is 1237) of delegates going into the convention. That part is simple, and that has not changed. And, no, the pledge was about supporting the eventual nominee, not just someone who got a plurality of the delegates.
I have no doubt that Trump supporters will be upset if Trump doesn't get the nomination. I expect them to throw around the term 'stolen' and such like if Trump doesn't get the nomination (REGARDLESS of whether he has a majority).
But I think RS is asking what the reaction will be if Trump gets 1237 delegates and still does not get the nomination. |
[Insert Acts Pun Here] Posts: 14803 3/27/16 4:52 pm

|
|
| |
 |
And the answer is.... |
spartanfan |
bonnie knox wrote: | spartanfan, having a plurality is not a majority, and, no, Trump does not 'deserve' to win if he does not have a majority (i.e. 50% + 1, which is 1237) of delegates going into the convention. That part is simple, and that has not changed. And, no, the pledge was about supporting the eventual nominee, not just someone who got a plurality of the delegates.
I have no doubt that Trump supporters will be upset if Trump doesn't get the nomination. I expect them to throw around the term 'stolen' and such like if Trump doesn't get the nomination (REGARDLESS of whether he has a majority).
But I think RS is asking what the reaction will be if Trump gets 1237 delegates and still does not get the nomination. |
The answer is that millions will leave the republican party and the democrats will win the election. That's an easy answer. And I don't even like him but if the republicans will not accept someone who's not Illuminati controlled then who wants to be a republican? |
Golf Cart Mafia Underboss Posts: 3638 3/27/16 5:59 pm
|
|
| |
 |
(L) |
bonnie knox |
|
| |
 |
|
revuriah |
Seriously, I think we are at the end of the GOP. They have shown that they care only for themselves, and have written off their base. They are mostly big-government progressives.
It does seem as if Trump's supporters are the ones wanting the rules changed. They want Trump to be the nominee with just a plurality that falls short of 1237 delegates. Just because he has more. That isn't how this works. In that case, a contested convention is going to happen, and that is when the establishment will force yet another RINO on us like Kasich, Christie, or Romney.
The GOP is dead. _________________ The World As I See It
http://worldjeffreysees.blogspot.com/
Revuriah's Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/people/Jeff-Richard/1226257444
Jeffrey David Richard's Myspace Music
www.myspace.com/547856946 |
Golf Cart Mafia Underboss Posts: 3682 3/27/16 6:33 pm

|
|
| |
 |
Re: (L) |
Resident Skeptic |
March 1980: Reagan Faces Probable Defeat – Trails Carter by 15 Points
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/03/337295/ _________________ "It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI |
Acts-dicted Posts: 8065 3/27/16 6:55 pm
|
|
| |
 |
|
|