Actscelerate.com Forum Index Actscelerate.com
Open Any Time -- Day or Night
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
r/Actscelerate
Browse by what's: hot | new | rising | top of the week

Pastor's who teach the principle of the tithe
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
   Actscelerate.com Forum Index -> Feature Presentations This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Message Author
Post krista
Resident Skeptic wrote:
Quote:
It's based proportionately, which would point us to the Tithe. The Tithe is exactly that.


And yet you have nothing you can use in context that points you to a tithe.


delete


Last edited by krista on 3/9/12 1:11 pm; edited 1 time in total
Golf Cart Mafia Capo
Posts: 2960
3/7/12 11:21 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Re: Pastor's who teach the principle of the tithe TarheelBishop
Tracy S Hamilton wrote:
Jack Hayford
Robert Morris
Brady Boyd
Stovall Weems
Joel Osteen
Craig Groeschel
Andy Stanley - the blessing of being a percentage giver (tither)
Loran Livingston
Jentezen Franklin
Ed Young Sr.
Ed Young Jr.
Charles Blake
Bob Coy
Kerry Shook
Dave Stone
T.D. Jakes
Joe Champion
Creflo Dollar
Chuck Smith
Greg Surratt
Tommy Barnett
Jimmy Evans

The list could go on and on and on...... I think all of these men are pretty sound doctrinally and all teach on tithing. Surely that can't all be wrong or maybe they just haven't read Actscelerate.


+1
_________________
"This is just me thinking outloud!"

God bless our troops (especially the snipers)!
Acts Enthusiast
Posts: 1753
3/7/12 1:59 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Re: Pastor's who teach the principle of the tithe Resident Skeptic
TarheelBishop wrote:
Tracy S Hamilton wrote:
Jack Hayford
Robert Morris
Brady Boyd
Stovall Weems
Joel Osteen
Craig Groeschel
Andy Stanley - the blessing of being a percentage giver (tither)
Loran Livingston
Jentezen Franklin
Ed Young Sr.
Ed Young Jr.
Charles Blake
Bob Coy
Kerry Shook
Dave Stone
T.D. Jakes
Joe Champion
Creflo Dollar
Chuck Smith
Greg Surratt
Tommy Barnett
Jimmy Evans

The list could go on and on and on...... I think all of these men are pretty sound doctrinally and all teach on tithing. Surely that can't all be wrong or maybe they just haven't read Actscelerate.


+1


Yes, a hearty +1 for false teachers.

Trammell posts tons of scripture and Tracey posts a list of names. Umm, I'll go with Tremmell.
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
3/7/12 2:09 pm


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Reply with quote
Post Resident Skeptic
krista wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
Quote:
It's based proportionately, which would point us to the Tithe. The Tithe is exactly that.


And yet you have nothing you can use in context that points you to a tithe.


More than giving as one purposes in their heart. That is false teaching and is not the model for giving. If you want to give according to 2 Corinthians 9, go for it.


Even if Tremmell is wrong on one point, that does not help your cause. Better to miss it on one point than to miss it on dozens of points like the "tithers" do.
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
3/7/12 2:10 pm


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Reply with quote
Post Re: Pastor's who teach the principle of the tithe krista
Resident Skeptic wrote:
TarheelBishop wrote:
Tracy S Hamilton wrote:
Jack Hayford
Robert Morris
Brady Boyd
Stovall Weems
Joel Osteen
Craig Groeschel
Andy Stanley - the blessing of being a percentage giver (tither)
Loran Livingston
Jentezen Franklin
Ed Young Sr.
Ed Young Jr.
Charles Blake
Bob Coy
Kerry Shook
Dave Stone
T.D. Jakes
Joe Champion
Creflo Dollar
Chuck Smith
Greg Surratt
Tommy Barnett
Jimmy Evans

The list could go on and on and on...... I think all of these men are pretty sound doctrinally and all teach on tithing. Surely that can't all be wrong or maybe they just haven't read Actscelerate.


+1


Yes, a hearty +1 for false teachers.

Trammell posts tons of scripture and Tracey posts a list of names. Umm, I'll go with Tremmell.


delete


Last edited by krista on 3/9/12 1:11 pm; edited 1 time in total
Golf Cart Mafia Capo
Posts: 2960
3/7/12 2:12 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post krista
Major B. Trammell wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:

Even if Tremmell is wrong on one point, that does not help your cause. Better to miss it on one point than to miss it on dozens of points like the "tithers" do.


But, Trammell is not wrong on any of the points in his post in the Myths About Tithing/ Truths About Christian Giving post.

I know you haven't been here for a terribly long time, but krista's purpose on this board is not and never has been to engage in discussions on the issues. He/She trolls this forum looking for an opportunity to stifle discussion and truth that is opposed to traditions. He/She is a contrarian and, as far as I can tell a parody (a poster who is only here as a joke and/or to cause problems). He/She is not to be taken seriously. Since her (I use the feminine pronoun, here, since the name "krista" is feminine, but I don't really know its true identity) arrival, here on Acts, she has not ceased to follow me (and a couple of others) from thread to thread lobbing personal attacks instead of discussion. She stalks, harasses, and attacks and it just goes on and on without end.

For explicit proof of this just do a search of my posts over the past two days and then compare a search of hers over the same period of time (or I can just give links, if you wish) She's followed me to nearly every thread I've posted in and lobbed the personal attacks about my character, my pastorate, my integrity, my motives, and has implied falsehoods about me instead of engaging in the issue.

Then, she pretends to wonder why those she stalks, harasses, and attacks do not reply to her posts. The answer is because she is not seeking discussion. She is only seeking to continue her game.

And so it continues, unchecked.


delete


Last edited by krista on 3/9/12 1:12 pm; edited 1 time in total
Golf Cart Mafia Capo
Posts: 2960
3/7/12 3:05 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post krista
Resident Skeptic wrote:
krista wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
Quote:
It's based proportionately, which would point us to the Tithe. The Tithe is exactly that.


And yet you have nothing you can use in context that points you to a tithe.


More than giving as one purposes in their heart. That is false teaching and is not the model for giving. If you want to give according to 2 Corinthians 9, go for it.


Even if Tremmell is wrong on one point, that does not help your cause. Better to miss it on one point than to miss it on dozens of points like the "tithers" do.


delete


Last edited by krista on 3/9/12 1:12 pm; edited 1 time in total
Golf Cart Mafia Capo
Posts: 2960
3/7/12 3:36 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Resident Skeptic
krista wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
krista wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
Quote:
It's based proportionately, which would point us to the Tithe. The Tithe is exactly that.


And yet you have nothing you can use in context that points you to a tithe.


More than giving as one purposes in their heart. That is false teaching and is not the model for giving. If you want to give according to 2 Corinthians 9, go for it.


Even if Tremmell is wrong on one point, that does not help your cause. Better to miss it on one point than to miss it on dozens of points like the "tithers" do.


Then back it up. Those dozen times tithers miss it....back it up.



Trammell's original essay did indeed "back it up". You simply can't respond to his points. Pretending they aren't there won't change anything.
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
3/7/12 4:13 pm


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Reply with quote
Post krista
Resident Skeptic wrote:
krista wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
krista wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
Quote:
It's based proportionately, which would point us to the Tithe. The Tithe is exactly that.


And yet you have nothing you can use in context that points you to a tithe.


More than giving as one purposes in their heart. That is false teaching and is not the model for giving. If you want to give according to 2 Corinthians 9, go for it.


Even if Tremmell is wrong on one point, that does not help your cause. Better to miss it on one point than to miss it on dozens of points like the "tithers" do.


Then back it up. Those dozen times tithers miss it....back it up.



Trammell's original essay did indeed "back it up". You simply can't respond to his points. Pretending they aren't there won't change anything.


delete


Last edited by krista on 3/9/12 1:13 pm; edited 1 time in total
Golf Cart Mafia Capo
Posts: 2960
3/7/12 7:20 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Resident Skeptic
krista wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
krista wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
krista wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
Quote:
It's based proportionately, which would point us to the Tithe. The Tithe is exactly that.


And yet you have nothing you can use in context that points you to a tithe.


More than giving as one purposes in their heart. That is false teaching and is not the model for giving. If you want to give according to 2 Corinthians 9, go for it.


Even if Tremmell is wrong on one point, that does not help your cause. Better to miss it on one point than to miss it on dozens of points like the "tithers" do.


Then back it up. Those dozen times tithers miss it....back it up.



Trammell's original essay did indeed "back it up". You simply can't respond to his points. Pretending they aren't there won't change anything.


Are you writing this as you draw Trammel's bathwater?


Every time you write something you prove just how desperate you are. You really aren't worth responding to.
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
3/7/12 9:22 pm


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Reply with quote
Post krista
Resident Skeptic wrote:
krista wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
krista wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
krista wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
Quote:
It's based proportionately, which would point us to the Tithe. The Tithe is exactly that.


And yet you have nothing you can use in context that points you to a tithe.


More than giving as one purposes in their heart. That is false teaching and is not the model for giving. If you want to give according to 2 Corinthians 9, go for it.


Even if Tremmell is wrong on one point, that does not help your cause. Better to miss it on one point than to miss it on dozens of points like the "tithers" do.


Then back it up. Those dozen times tithers miss it....back it up.



Trammell's original essay did indeed "back it up". You simply can't respond to his points. Pretending they aren't there won't change anything.


Are you writing this as you draw Trammel's bathwater?


Every time you write something you prove just how desperate you are. You really aren't worth responding to.


delete
Golf Cart Mafia Capo
Posts: 2960
3/8/12 2:56 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Actscelerate.com Forum Index -> Feature Presentations This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Acts-celerate Terms of Use | Acts-celerate Policy
Contact the Administrator.


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group :: Spelling by SpellingCow.