| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Message |
Author |
 Former Trump insider (L) |
revuriah |
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
| Re: Former Trump insider (L) |
Resident Skeptic |
|
|
| |
|
| |
revuriah |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Resident Skeptic |
| revuriah wrote: | | My point in posting is that Trump is looking out for himself. |
You use the writings of a fraud to make that point? If the person who wrote that letter has been discredited, then maybe the idea that Trump is only looking out for himself is also discredited.
_________________
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI |
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
3/31/16 4:45 pm
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
bonnie knox |
| Resident, was anything in the letter itself wrong? Often, a publication will put their own headline on something. Does she not correctly identify herself in the body of the letter? In other words, is she the fraud or is there just a sensational headline (as publications are wont to do)? |
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 14803
3/31/16 5:13 pm
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Resident Skeptic |
| bonnie knox wrote: | | Resident, was anything in the letter itself wrong? Often, a publication will put their own headline on something. Does she not correctly identify herself in the body of the letter? In other words, is she the fraud or is there just a sensational headline (as publications are wont to do)? |
She was trying to inflate her importance and influence in the Trump camp. Nothing she says is credible.
_________________
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI |
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
3/31/16 5:27 pm
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
bonnie knox |
| Quote: | | She was trying to inflate her importance and influence in the Trump camp. |
She identified herself correctly as the "Communications Director of the Make America Great Again Super PAC."
Do you think she actually wrote the headline?? Good grief.
As to what she said being "credible," you are calling her a fraud and lacking in credibility, when in actuality, you just disagree with her opinion. |
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 14803
3/31/16 5:35 pm
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Resident Skeptic |
| bonnie knox wrote: | | Quote: | | She was trying to inflate her importance and influence in the Trump camp. |
She identified herself correctly as the "Communications Director of the Make America Great Again Super PAC."
Do you think she actually wrote the headline?? Good grief.
As to what she said being "credible," you are calling her a fraud and lacking in credibility, when in actuality, you just disagree with her opinion. |
There are plenty of reasons to have reservations about Trump. But those who truly know him scoff at the idea that he never really wanted to be President. Let's deal in reality and not fantasy. Anti-Trumpers claim he does not talk enough about policy. Perhaps they should start that conversation instead of chasing silly fairy tales.
_________________
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI |
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
3/31/16 5:54 pm
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
bonnie knox |
The reality is that she identified herself correctly. She is not a fraud as you say.
If you disagree with her opinion, that's fine; everybody has an opinion.
But you are trying to change the subject after you claimed she was a fraud and say "already debunked."
That's the only part of this I'm addressing. Frankly, I'm not interested in the debate of whether or not Trump wants to be president.
I just think it's wrong to call someone a fraud over a headline which the person who wrote the opinion piece most likely did not write. |
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 14803
3/31/16 7:42 pm
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
revuriah |
Sorry, RS, I've been working for 10 hours today. Just got a chance to respond.
That snopes link did not debunk the article. She did correctly explain her position. More than that, she articulated who Trump is.
If you are so concerned about falsehood, why support Trump? He has made his campaign on falsehood. He has repeatedly accused Cruz of lying, even when his hand is caught in the cookie jar. Just today, he brazenly lied AGAIN, about his off the cuff remark that women who have abortions, should it ever be illegal, should be jailed. Then his campaign says the doctors should, and that's been his position all along. No, his position changes when the heat comes, then it's lie like Obama till everyone repeats it. Dude is actually pulling a Saul Alinsky.
_________________
The World As I See It
http://worldjeffreysees.blogspot.com/
Revuriah's Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/people/Jeff-Richard/1226257444
Jeffrey David Richard's Myspace Music
www.myspace.com/547856946 |
Golf Cart Mafia Underboss
Posts: 3682
3/31/16 7:48 pm
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Resident Skeptic |
| revuriah wrote: | Sorry, RS, I've been working for 10 hours today. Just got a chance to respond.
That snopes link did not debunk the article. She did correctly explain her position. More than that, she articulated who Trump is.
If you are so concerned about falsehood, why support Trump? He has made his campaign on falsehood. He has repeatedly accused Cruz of lying, even when his hand is caught in the cookie jar. Just today, he brazenly lied AGAIN, about his off the cuff remark that women who have abortions, should it ever be illegal, should be jailed. Then his campaign says the doctors should, and that's been his position all along. No, his position changes when the heat comes, then it's lie like Obama till everyone repeats it. Dude is actually pulling a Saul Alinsky. |
Your disposition against Trump causes you to read into him things that are not there. Every politicians says things that an hour later he wishes he had articulated differently. This is the rabid fanaticism of the "Never Trump" crowd. They hold Trump to a standard Cruz is never held to.They are more like Alinsky than Trump ever will be. As for the article, no the stupid phony writer did not articulate who Trump is. The very idea that he never really wanted to be President is believed only by the very weak minded. It is one of the silliest premises out there. Go for it if it makes you feel good.
_________________
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI |
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
4/1/16 8:01 pm
|
|
|
| |
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
