Actscelerate.com Forum Index Actscelerate.com
Open Any Time -- Day or Night
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
r/Actscelerate
Browse by what's: hot | new | rising | top of the week

So Trumps morals disqualify him, huh?
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
   Actscelerate.com Forum Index -> Acts-Celerate Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Message Author
Post c6thplayer1
Resident Skeptic wrote:
c6thplayer1 wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
c6thplayer1 wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
c6thplayer1 wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
c6thplayer1 wrote:
MLK just spoke and emphasized the equal rights that are guaranteed by our constitution. A large majority of people back then and today still dont know what our constitution is about. So many of the folks affiliated MLK's speeches as a marvelous creation of equality he owns.

As far as the holiday , to some it just keeps racism alive.



Quote:
In the wake of the Civil War, three amendments were added to the U.S. Constitution. The Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery (1865), the Fourteenth Amendment made freed slaves citizens of the United States and the state wherein they lived (1868), and the Fifteenth Amendment gave the vote to men of any race (1870). During this time, the nation struggled with what role four million newly freed slaves would assume in American life. With the triumph of the Radical Republicans in Congress, the Constitution was amended to grant full citizenship to former slaves and promise them equal treatment under the law, a promise that took more than a century to fulfill.


You're not getting it. I don't think you understand what I'm driving at or why I mentioned MLK at all in reference to Trump's morals.

Here's the bottom line. If having a history of sexual immorality disqualified Trump from being President, at least in the mind of anyone who is consistent, it should disqualify MLK from having his birthday celebrated as a national holiday. MLK also had a history of sexual immorality up until the night before he was murdered. This has nothing to do with his race, though someone has already insinuated I'm being a racist. This has everything to do with consistency. So if Trump should not be President, MLK's birthday should not be celebrated as a national holiday, either.


I somewhat agree with you. Any leader of people should display acceptable morals. We know there is no such thing as moral purity in any sect. Mans Morality is on a sliding scale from the worst to the best. None are perfect.

The point that I would make is that neither of the candidates have the morals to be POTUS not to mention the direction either would take our country. While Hillary's morals , in my opinion , are worse than Trumps , both reside close to the bottom of the scale.

As Far as MLK holiday , his positive actions should be weighed against his improprieties and go from there.


But not Trump?


OF course his positve attributes should be weighted ... What are his positive attributes ?


You'd have to be in total denial to say he has not helped a whole lot of people who were in trouble. His platform alone is a huge counter balance to his faults.

But of course that is not the point. You can't have it both ways.

MLK was a serial adulterer, denied the deity of Christ and inerrancy of scripture and was a plagiarist. Yey most Never Trump Republicans would even consider that these defects disqualify him from being considered the father of the Civil Rights movement and his birthday made a national holiday. But when it comes to Trump, we pick up our stones and start throwing and shout NEVER TRUMP.

You won't see very many comments posted to this thread because they know I'm telling the truth. Woe unto Pharisees! Hypocrites!!


I'm sure he has helped a lot of people , He has also shafted a lot of people.
Looks like we can have it both ways here.

I really dont know enough about MLK to make an argument.

I would never throw stones until I see that the target has abused others and profits at someones else's expense and gets away with it.

Would saying you would release your tax returns after the audit and now saying he would not release his tax return qualify him as a hypocrite or just a liar?

hmmm;

He has blinded their eyes and hardened their hearts, so they can neither see with their eyes, nor understand with their hearts.



It seems you may not really know as much about Trump as you think you do, either.


It appears that you do not either. I now understand how a person can be entrapped in a cult.
Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology
Posts: 6385
7/30/16 6:43 pm


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Reply with quote
Post Resident Skeptic
c6thplayer1 wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
c6thplayer1 wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
c6thplayer1 wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
c6thplayer1 wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
c6thplayer1 wrote:
MLK just spoke and emphasized the equal rights that are guaranteed by our constitution. A large majority of people back then and today still dont know what our constitution is about. So many of the folks affiliated MLK's speeches as a marvelous creation of equality he owns.

As far as the holiday , to some it just keeps racism alive.



Quote:
In the wake of the Civil War, three amendments were added to the U.S. Constitution. The Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery (1865), the Fourteenth Amendment made freed slaves citizens of the United States and the state wherein they lived (1868), and the Fifteenth Amendment gave the vote to men of any race (1870). During this time, the nation struggled with what role four million newly freed slaves would assume in American life. With the triumph of the Radical Republicans in Congress, the Constitution was amended to grant full citizenship to former slaves and promise them equal treatment under the law, a promise that took more than a century to fulfill.


You're not getting it. I don't think you understand what I'm driving at or why I mentioned MLK at all in reference to Trump's morals.

Here's the bottom line. If having a history of sexual immorality disqualified Trump from being President, at least in the mind of anyone who is consistent, it should disqualify MLK from having his birthday celebrated as a national holiday. MLK also had a history of sexual immorality up until the night before he was murdered. This has nothing to do with his race, though someone has already insinuated I'm being a racist. This has everything to do with consistency. So if Trump should not be President, MLK's birthday should not be celebrated as a national holiday, either.


I somewhat agree with you. Any leader of people should display acceptable morals. We know there is no such thing as moral purity in any sect. Mans Morality is on a sliding scale from the worst to the best. None are perfect.

The point that I would make is that neither of the candidates have the morals to be POTUS not to mention the direction either would take our country. While Hillary's morals , in my opinion , are worse than Trumps , both reside close to the bottom of the scale.

As Far as MLK holiday , his positive actions should be weighed against his improprieties and go from there.


But not Trump?


OF course his positve attributes should be weighted ... What are his positive attributes ?


You'd have to be in total denial to say he has not helped a whole lot of people who were in trouble. His platform alone is a huge counter balance to his faults.

But of course that is not the point. You can't have it both ways.

MLK was a serial adulterer, denied the deity of Christ and inerrancy of scripture and was a plagiarist. Yey most Never Trump Republicans would even consider that these defects disqualify him from being considered the father of the Civil Rights movement and his birthday made a national holiday. But when it comes to Trump, we pick up our stones and start throwing and shout NEVER TRUMP.

You won't see very many comments posted to this thread because they know I'm telling the truth. Woe unto Pharisees! Hypocrites!!


I'm sure he has helped a lot of people , He has also shafted a lot of people.
Looks like we can have it both ways here.

I really dont know enough about MLK to make an argument.

I would never throw stones until I see that the target has abused others and profits at someones else's expense and gets away with it.

Would saying you would release your tax returns after the audit and now saying he would not release his tax return qualify him as a hypocrite or just a liar?

hmmm;

He has blinded their eyes and hardened their hearts, so they can neither see with their eyes, nor understand with their hearts.



It seems you may not really know as much about Trump as you think you do, either.


It appears that you do not either. I now understand how a person can be entrapped in a cult.


No, I admit Trump has faults. But you certainly are a fine one talking about someone acting like a cultist. The NeverTrump movement is about as cultic as it gets.
_________________
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
7/30/16 6:53 pm


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Reply with quote
Post c6thplayer1
Resident Skeptic wrote:
c6thplayer1 wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
c6thplayer1 wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
c6thplayer1 wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
c6thplayer1 wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
c6thplayer1 wrote:
MLK just spoke and emphasized the equal rights that are guaranteed by our constitution. A large majority of people back then and today still dont know what our constitution is about. So many of the folks affiliated MLK's speeches as a marvelous creation of equality he owns.

As far as the holiday , to some it just keeps racism alive.



Quote:
In the wake of the Civil War, three amendments were added to the U.S. Constitution. The Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery (1865), the Fourteenth Amendment made freed slaves citizens of the United States and the state wherein they lived (1868), and the Fifteenth Amendment gave the vote to men of any race (1870). During this time, the nation struggled with what role four million newly freed slaves would assume in American life. With the triumph of the Radical Republicans in Congress, the Constitution was amended to grant full citizenship to former slaves and promise them equal treatment under the law, a promise that took more than a century to fulfill.


You're not getting it. I don't think you understand what I'm driving at or why I mentioned MLK at all in reference to Trump's morals.

Here's the bottom line. If having a history of sexual immorality disqualified Trump from being President, at least in the mind of anyone who is consistent, it should disqualify MLK from having his birthday celebrated as a national holiday. MLK also had a history of sexual immorality up until the night before he was murdered. This has nothing to do with his race, though someone has already insinuated I'm being a racist. This has everything to do with consistency. So if Trump should not be President, MLK's birthday should not be celebrated as a national holiday, either.


I somewhat agree with you. Any leader of people should display acceptable morals. We know there is no such thing as moral purity in any sect. Mans Morality is on a sliding scale from the worst to the best. None are perfect.

The point that I would make is that neither of the candidates have the morals to be POTUS not to mention the direction either would take our country. While Hillary's morals , in my opinion , are worse than Trumps , both reside close to the bottom of the scale.

As Far as MLK holiday , his positive actions should be weighed against his improprieties and go from there.


But not Trump?


OF course his positve attributes should be weighted ... What are his positive attributes ?


You'd have to be in total denial to say he has not helped a whole lot of people who were in trouble. His platform alone is a huge counter balance to his faults.

But of course that is not the point. You can't have it both ways.

MLK was a serial adulterer, denied the deity of Christ and inerrancy of scripture and was a plagiarist. Yey most Never Trump Republicans would even consider that these defects disqualify him from being considered the father of the Civil Rights movement and his birthday made a national holiday. But when it comes to Trump, we pick up our stones and start throwing and shout NEVER TRUMP.

You won't see very many comments posted to this thread because they know I'm telling the truth. Woe unto Pharisees! Hypocrites!!


I'm sure he has helped a lot of people , He has also shafted a lot of people.
Looks like we can have it both ways here.

I really dont know enough about MLK to make an argument.

I would never throw stones until I see that the target has abused others and profits at someones else's expense and gets away with it.

Would saying you would release your tax returns after the audit and now saying he would not release his tax return qualify him as a hypocrite or just a liar?

hmmm;

He has blinded their eyes and hardened their hearts, so they can neither see with their eyes, nor understand with their hearts.



It seems you may not really know as much about Trump as you think you do, either.


It appears that you do not either. I now understand how a person can be entrapped in a cult.


No, I admit Trump has faults. But you certainly are a fine one talking about someone acting like a cultist. The NeverTrump movement is about as cultic as it gets.


Res your sounding and acting just like trump. Anyone who dont agree with you then instead of calling them names you just imply that they are Pharisees! Hypocrites.

If you ever need a friend who wont budge on treating people with respect , not cheating anyone , not taking advantage of anyone , not lying for self preservation or profit then look me up. You can bet on that.

If you want the opposite then hang with trump and his kind.

And I'm not part of any movement. I just stand for what is right even if I stand alone.
Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology
Posts: 6385
7/30/16 8:39 pm


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Reply with quote
Post Resident Skeptic
c6thplayer1 wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
c6thplayer1 wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
c6thplayer1 wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
c6thplayer1 wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
c6thplayer1 wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
c6thplayer1 wrote:
MLK just spoke and emphasized the equal rights that are guaranteed by our constitution. A large majority of people back then and today still dont know what our constitution is about. So many of the folks affiliated MLK's speeches as a marvelous creation of equality he owns.

As far as the holiday , to some it just keeps racism alive.



Quote:
In the wake of the Civil War, three amendments were added to the U.S. Constitution. The Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery (1865), the Fourteenth Amendment made freed slaves citizens of the United States and the state wherein they lived (1868), and the Fifteenth Amendment gave the vote to men of any race (1870). During this time, the nation struggled with what role four million newly freed slaves would assume in American life. With the triumph of the Radical Republicans in Congress, the Constitution was amended to grant full citizenship to former slaves and promise them equal treatment under the law, a promise that took more than a century to fulfill.


You're not getting it. I don't think you understand what I'm driving at or why I mentioned MLK at all in reference to Trump's morals.

Here's the bottom line. If having a history of sexual immorality disqualified Trump from being President, at least in the mind of anyone who is consistent, it should disqualify MLK from having his birthday celebrated as a national holiday. MLK also had a history of sexual immorality up until the night before he was murdered. This has nothing to do with his race, though someone has already insinuated I'm being a racist. This has everything to do with consistency. So if Trump should not be President, MLK's birthday should not be celebrated as a national holiday, either.


I somewhat agree with you. Any leader of people should display acceptable morals. We know there is no such thing as moral purity in any sect. Mans Morality is on a sliding scale from the worst to the best. None are perfect.

The point that I would make is that neither of the candidates have the morals to be POTUS not to mention the direction either would take our country. While Hillary's morals , in my opinion , are worse than Trumps , both reside close to the bottom of the scale.

As Far as MLK holiday , his positive actions should be weighed against his improprieties and go from there.


But not Trump?


OF course his positve attributes should be weighted ... What are his positive attributes ?


You'd have to be in total denial to say he has not helped a whole lot of people who were in trouble. His platform alone is a huge counter balance to his faults.

But of course that is not the point. You can't have it both ways.

MLK was a serial adulterer, denied the deity of Christ and inerrancy of scripture and was a plagiarist. Yey most Never Trump Republicans would even consider that these defects disqualify him from being considered the father of the Civil Rights movement and his birthday made a national holiday. But when it comes to Trump, we pick up our stones and start throwing and shout NEVER TRUMP.

You won't see very many comments posted to this thread because they know I'm telling the truth. Woe unto Pharisees! Hypocrites!!


I'm sure he has helped a lot of people , He has also shafted a lot of people.
Looks like we can have it both ways here.

I really dont know enough about MLK to make an argument.

I would never throw stones until I see that the target has abused others and profits at someones else's expense and gets away with it.

Would saying you would release your tax returns after the audit and now saying he would not release his tax return qualify him as a hypocrite or just a liar?

hmmm;

He has blinded their eyes and hardened their hearts, so they can neither see with their eyes, nor understand with their hearts.



It seems you may not really know as much about Trump as you think you do, either.


It appears that you do not either. I now understand how a person can be entrapped in a cult.


No, I admit Trump has faults. But you certainly are a fine one talking about someone acting like a cultist. The NeverTrump movement is about as cultic as it gets.


Res your sounding and acting just like trump. Anyone who dont agree with you then instead of calling them names you just imply that they are Pharisees! Hypocrites.

If you ever need a friend who wont budge on treating people with respect , not cheating anyone , not taking advantage of anyone , not lying for self preservation or profit then look me up. You can bet on that.

If you want the opposite then hang with trump and his kind.

And I'm not part of any movement. I just stand for what is right even if I stand alone.


If you do not feel that the shoe I'm speaking of fits you, then do not wear it. Again, I admit Trump gives us reasons to be cautious. But several Christians have jumped on the Never Trump band wagon over his moral failures while singing the praises of MLK and they do not even see the irony. THAT is cultic. But please know I am not taking shots at you personally. I realize I'm rather blunt at times. But it is not personal.
_________________
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
7/30/16 9:05 pm


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Reply with quote
Post c6thplayer1
Resident Skeptic wrote:
c6thplayer1 wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
c6thplayer1 wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
c6thplayer1 wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
c6thplayer1 wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
c6thplayer1 wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
c6thplayer1 wrote:
MLK just spoke and emphasized the equal rights that are guaranteed by our constitution. A large majority of people back then and today still dont know what our constitution is about. So many of the folks affiliated MLK's speeches as a marvelous creation of equality he owns.

As far as the holiday , to some it just keeps racism alive.



Quote:
In the wake of the Civil War, three amendments were added to the U.S. Constitution. The Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery (1865), the Fourteenth Amendment made freed slaves citizens of the United States and the state wherein they lived (1868), and the Fifteenth Amendment gave the vote to men of any race (1870). During this time, the nation struggled with what role four million newly freed slaves would assume in American life. With the triumph of the Radical Republicans in Congress, the Constitution was amended to grant full citizenship to former slaves and promise them equal treatment under the law, a promise that took more than a century to fulfill.


You're not getting it. I don't think you understand what I'm driving at or why I mentioned MLK at all in reference to Trump's morals.

Here's the bottom line. If having a history of sexual immorality disqualified Trump from being President, at least in the mind of anyone who is consistent, it should disqualify MLK from having his birthday celebrated as a national holiday. MLK also had a history of sexual immorality up until the night before he was murdered. This has nothing to do with his race, though someone has already insinuated I'm being a racist. This has everything to do with consistency. So if Trump should not be President, MLK's birthday should not be celebrated as a national holiday, either.


I somewhat agree with you. Any leader of people should display acceptable morals. We know there is no such thing as moral purity in any sect. Mans Morality is on a sliding scale from the worst to the best. None are perfect.

The point that I would make is that neither of the candidates have the morals to be POTUS not to mention the direction either would take our country. While Hillary's morals , in my opinion , are worse than Trumps , both reside close to the bottom of the scale.

As Far as MLK holiday , his positive actions should be weighed against his improprieties and go from there.


But not Trump?


OF course his positve attributes should be weighted ... What are his positive attributes ?


You'd have to be in total denial to say he has not helped a whole lot of people who were in trouble. His platform alone is a huge counter balance to his faults.

But of course that is not the point. You can't have it both ways.

MLK was a serial adulterer, denied the deity of Christ and inerrancy of scripture and was a plagiarist. Yey most Never Trump Republicans would even consider that these defects disqualify him from being considered the father of the Civil Rights movement and his birthday made a national holiday. But when it comes to Trump, we pick up our stones and start throwing and shout NEVER TRUMP.

You won't see very many comments posted to this thread because they know I'm telling the truth. Woe unto Pharisees! Hypocrites!!


I'm sure he has helped a lot of people , He has also shafted a lot of people.
Looks like we can have it both ways here.

I really dont know enough about MLK to make an argument.

I would never throw stones until I see that the target has abused others and profits at someones else's expense and gets away with it.

Would saying you would release your tax returns after the audit and now saying he would not release his tax return qualify him as a hypocrite or just a liar?

hmmm;

He has blinded their eyes and hardened their hearts, so they can neither see with their eyes, nor understand with their hearts.



It seems you may not really know as much about Trump as you think you do, either.


It appears that you do not either. I now understand how a person can be entrapped in a cult.


No, I admit Trump has faults. But you certainly are a fine one talking about someone acting like a cultist. The NeverTrump movement is about as cultic as it gets.


Res your sounding and acting just like trump. Anyone who dont agree with you then instead of calling them names you just imply that they are Pharisees! Hypocrites.

If you ever need a friend who wont budge on treating people with respect , not cheating anyone , not taking advantage of anyone , not lying for self preservation or profit then look me up. You can bet on that.

If you want the opposite then hang with trump and his kind.

And I'm not part of any movement. I just stand for what is right even if I stand alone.


If you do not feel that the shoe I'm speaking of fits you, then do not wear it. Again, I admit Trump gives us reasons to be cautious. But several Christians have jumped on the Never Trump band wagon over his moral failures while singing the praises of MLK and they do not even see the irony. THAT is cultic. But please know I am not taking shots at you personally. I realize I'm rather blunt at times. But it is not personal.


No offense taken. We all have our preferences and opinions.
Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology
Posts: 6385
7/30/16 9:21 pm


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Reply with quote
Post It's true: MLK was a serial adulterer... Aaron Scott
I remember reading the book "And the Walls Came Tumblin' Down" by Ralph Abernathy, his right hand man. He confessed that, yes, MLK did sleep around.

At the same time, David was a deeply flawed person also. And yet....

God uses flawed people. Why? Because that's all He has to work with! We are all flawed in some way.

It doesn't matter whom we elect. That person is going to be flawed. If it's not in the public record, it makes it no less so.

I'm not so much FOR Trump as I am against Hillary. I would really have preferred someone else to have won the nomination. But it is what it is...and we can act like the only people who can do the right thing are people who are perfect...or we can remember that David, in about as ugly of a scandal as you could imagine, was still a man after God's heart.

I don't think that Trump is a man after God's heart...but the point is that God can use flawed folks. For that matter, He can use Hillary (wait--was I supposed to say that?). The issue seems to be that Hillary has already decided against going God's way.
Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology
Posts: 6042
7/30/16 9:32 pm


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Post Re: It's true: MLK was a serial adulterer... Resident Skeptic
Aaron Scott wrote:
I remember reading the book "And the Walls Came Tumblin' Down" by Ralph Abernathy, his right hand man. He confessed that, yes, MLK did sleep around.

At the same time, David was a deeply flawed person also. And yet....

God uses flawed people. Why? Because that's all He has to work with! We are all flawed in some way.

It doesn't matter whom we elect. That person is going to be flawed. If it's not in the public record, it makes it no less so.

I'm not so much FOR Trump as I am against Hillary. I would really have preferred someone else to have won the nomination. But it is what it is...and we can act like the only people who can do the right thing are people who are perfect...or we can remember that David, in about as ugly of a scandal as you could imagine, was still a man after God's heart.

I don't think that Trump is a man after God's heart...but the point is that God can use flawed folks. For that matter, He can use Hillary (wait--was I supposed to say that?). The issue seems to be that Hillary has already decided against going God's way.


A fair post.
_________________
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
7/30/16 9:33 pm


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Reply with quote
Post Quiet Wyatt
I'm no defender or respecter of any serial adulterer, and MLK was not a politician but an activist, so the comparison is apples to oranges at best, but at least MLK wasn't a casino and strip club owner, and total fraud as a 'businessman' like Trump. #NeverTrump and #NeverHillary [Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 12817
7/30/16 9:38 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Cojak
Quiet Wyatt wrote:
I'm no defender or respecter of any serial adulterer, and MLK was not a politician but an activist, so the comparison is apples to oranges at best, but at least MLK wasn't a casino and strip club owner, and total fraud as a 'businessman' like Trump. #NeverTrump and #NeverHillary


As much as I respect you my friend, it is either Hillary or Trump. If in all honesty any other candidate (even green) has a chance, they get my vote, but logically it is either Hillary or Trump. Neither is NEVER! (at present) Sad
_________________
Some facts but mostly just my opinion!
jacsher@aol.com
http://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/


Last edited by Cojak on 7/31/16 1:44 pm; edited 1 time in total
01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011
Posts: 24285
7/31/16 12:16 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Re: It's true: MLK was a serial adulterer... Cojak
Aaron Scott wrote:
I remember reading the book "And the Walls Came Tumblin' Down" by Ralph Abernathy, his right hand man. He confessed that, yes, MLK did sleep around.

At the same time, David was a deeply flawed person also. And yet....

God uses flawed people. Why? Because that's all He has to work with! We are all flawed in some way.

It doesn't matter whom we elect. That person is going to be flawed. If it's not in the public record, it makes it no less so.

I'm not so much FOR Trump as I am against Hillary. I would really have preferred someone else to have won the nomination. But it is what it is...and we can act like the only people who can do the right thing are people who are perfect...or we can remember that David, in about as ugly of a scandal as you could imagine, was still a man after God's heart.

I don't think that Trump is a man after God's heart...but the point is that God can use flawed folks. For that matter, He can use Hillary (wait--was I supposed to say that?). The issue seems to be that Hillary has already decided against going God's way.


AGreed my friend, well said. Thumb Up
_________________
Some facts but mostly just my opinion!
jacsher@aol.com
http://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/
01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011
Posts: 24285
7/31/16 12:17 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Resident Skeptic
Quiet Wyatt wrote:
I'm no defender or respecter of any serial adulterer, and MLK was not a politician but an activist, so the comparison is apples to oranges at best, but at least MLK wasn't a casino and strip club owner, and total fraud as a 'businessman' like Trump. #NeverTrump and #NeverHillary


No. he was just plagiarized his doctoral thesis, used offering money to solicit prostitutes, and was a complete sexist treating women in his own organization very badly. But he gets a pass and is heralded as someone promoting equality and deserving of having three Presidents lose their birthdays as national holidays.
_________________
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
7/31/16 7:30 am


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Reply with quote
Post Quiet Wyatt
Resident Skeptic wrote:
Quiet Wyatt wrote:
I'm no defender or respecter of any serial adulterer, and MLK was not a politician but an activist, so the comparison is apples to oranges at best, but at least MLK wasn't a casino and strip club owner, and total fraud as a 'businessman' like Trump. #NeverTrump and #NeverHillary


No. he was just plagiarized his doctoral thesis, used offering money to solicit prostitutes, and was a complete sexist treating women in his own organization very badly. But he gets a pass and is heralded as someone promoting equality and deserving of having three Presidents lose their birthdays as national holidays.


As I said earlier, I am no fan of MLK. Except for his promotion of civil rights, I see nothing commendable in the man, certainly nothing worthy of a national holiday. But, they didn't ask me when they decided that he deserved a holiday named after him.
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 12817
7/31/16 9:03 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Actscelerate.com Forum Index -> Acts-Celerate Post new topic   Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Acts-celerate Terms of Use | Acts-celerate Policy
Contact the Administrator.


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group :: Spelling by SpellingCow.