 |
Actscelerate.com Open Any Time -- Day or Night
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Message |
Author |
|
Ventureforth |
| Eddie Robbins wrote: | | The lesser of 2 evils is still evil. |
Yep...........Yep..........(sigh!)
| Quote: | | But what if its more about not voting for the evil of two lessers ?? Laughing |
Not voting? That's another option I'm considering. I'll keep praying. |
Acts-celerater Posts: 651 6/30/16 10:09 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
|
|
Resident Skeptic |
| Ventureforth wrote: | | Eddie Robbins wrote: | | The lesser of 2 evils is still evil. |
Yep...........Yep..........(sigh!)
| Quote: | | But what if its more about not voting for the evil of two lessers ?? Laughing |
Not voting? That's another option I'm considering. I'll keep praying. |
It is obvious that the globalists take Trump seriously and are afraid. Thus if it looks like he is going to win, he may not live to see it. _________________ "It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI
Last edited by Resident Skeptic on 7/1/16 1:01 am; edited 1 time in total |
Acts-dicted Posts: 8065 6/30/16 10:35 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Cojak |
| Resident Skeptic wrote: | | Ventureforth wrote: | | Eddie Robbins wrote: | | The lesser of 2 evils is still evil. |
Yep...........Yep..........(sigh!)
| Quote: | | But what if its more about not voting for the evil of two lessers ?? Laughing |
Not voting? That's another option I'm considering. I'll keep praying. |
It is obvious that the globalists take Trump seriously and are afraid. Thus if it looks like he is doing to win, he may not live to see it. |
I don't see that RS, I do not think anyone who can possibly be connected to an assassination would complete the task.
I truly do not think anyone is out to 'kill/destroy' anyone in this case physically, but Imma thinking most anything will be done to elect Hillary. That includes conservatives who decide to sit this thing out. Someone who does not vote for the best opposition, is smiling at HIllary and saying, I know Trump cannot make it without my vote, I will accept another term of Obama thru Hillary.
Put Trump in, If he is as crazy as the 'Never Trump' fold says, He can be impeached. And that by a congress who would love to do it.
My vote will be, "anyone but Hillary" _________________ Some facts but mostly just my opinion!
jacsher@aol.com
http://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/ |
01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011 Posts: 24285 6/30/16 11:37 pm

|
|
|
| |
 |
|
UncleJD |
| Cojak wrote: | truly do not think anyone is out to 'kill/destroy' anyone in this case physically, but Imma thinking most anything will be done to elect Hillary. That includes conservatives who decide to sit this thing out. Someone who does not vote for the best opposition, is smiling at HIllary and saying, I know Trump cannot make it without my vote, I will accept another term of Obama thru Hillary.
Put Trump in, If he is as crazy as the 'Never Trump' fold says, He can be impeached. And that by a congress who would love to do it. |
I hear you Cojak and respect your opinion, but consider this. There are a lot of smart people out there that love their country and love the conservative movement very, very much who are saying that a Trump presidency will forever end the conservative movement of the Republican party, transforming it into a moderate/populist party and simultaneously cost the majorities in the house and senate. While I lean toward voting for him myself, I'm not willing to completely ignore what they are saying, at least considering the merit. Many well respected Republicans (who are not, in positions of power btw), are willing to bite the bullet with Hillary for 4 years rather than give up conservatism for the next 40. I'm not sure sure if I totally agree with them (like I said, I'm probably going to vote for Trump out of fear of Hillary), but I think they do offer something to think about (unless you just yell "NWO" and completely discount anything that goes against Trump). |
Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere Posts: 3147 7/1/16 9:24 am

|
|
|
| |
 |
|
UncleJD |
BTW - 7 polls came out yesterday. Only one had Trump ahead, one had him within 1, and the others were way ahead for Hillary.
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton IBD/TIPP Clinton 44, Trump 40 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Rasmussen Reports Clinton 39, Trump 43 Trump +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton PPP (D) Clinton 48, Trump 44 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Reuters/Ipsos Clinton 42, Trump 32 Clinton +10
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein IBD/TIPP Clinton 37, Trump 36, Johnson 9, Stein 5 Clinton +1
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein PPP (D) Clinton 45, Trump 41, Johnson 5, Stein 2 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein Reuters/Ipsos Clinton 42, Trump 31, Johnson 5, Stein 4 Clinton +11 |
Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere Posts: 3147 7/1/16 9:29 am

|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Methocostal |
The odds are you will never be polled by a Polling firm. Sometimes candidates will contact many people in their area, particularly if one is a registered member of a party, thus they may not be a statistically valid sample.
Typically, pollsters only select maybe 1,500 people nation wide. Because of how they are selected, they are suppose to be representative of the entire population within a "margin of error", typically maybe 3 to 5 percent. The 1948 election was off substantially due to "polling error" in that I believe they selected people with phone numbers and those people (in 1948) tended to be more well to do, and thus Republican. After that disaster, other methods were developed to improve the sample.
I suspect they may be approaching a similar problem today with the number of people that have cell phones that are not published and don't use land lines.
Obviously, pollsters in Britain either did not select a representative sample, or people were lying to the pollsters. I suspect more and more people are indeed lying to pollsters today, particularly if their view is not politically correct. Another problem with polls is they tend to use "likely voters". Those voters may not end up voting and others may vote that weren't a "likely voter", thus the sample is not correct.
Even with the best statistically accurate poll, errors can occur, thus the margin of error.
To get to your point though, with only 1,500 people selected in the typical nationwide poll, an individual voter will likely never be selected for a poll, but that, in itself, does not invalidate the poll.
The other problem is people change their mind, thus a poll today doesn't mean the same 3 months from now even if the same 1,500 people were selected. If Hillary is indicted (spelling?), the numbers could change dramatically. Goodness, it is even possible indictment may help her numbers if people perceive it is simply political (which is interesting given the AG is democrat). Trump may open his mouth one too many times and lose much of his following.
Of all the reasons polls could be wrong, the fact that a particular person was not selected is not a valid reason for their inaccuracy.
| georgiapath wrote: | | Resident Skeptic wrote: |
In that same poll you cite, she leads only by 2 among "interested voters". |
The polls don't tell us anything, nobody has polled me, have they you? |
|
Friendly Face Posts: 496 7/1/16 9:31 am
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
bonnie knox |
I've been polled various times. (I'm home a lot, and I have a landline.) The most recent poll (within the last few days) did ask me about the national candidates, but it seemed to ask more about the state races. It might have been what is known as a "push poll."
Anyway, if someone calls me to poll me, I try to participate. I'm always glad that someone actually seems interested in my opinion.
I get the idea, though, that some of these polls are merely used to find out which topic will be the best one for the candidate to campaign on. |
[Insert Acts Pun Here] Posts: 14803 7/1/16 9:46 am

|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Resident Skeptic |
| UncleJD wrote: | BTW - 7 polls came out yesterday. Only one had Trump ahead, one had him within 1, and the others were way ahead for Hillary.
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton IBD/TIPP Clinton 44, Trump 40 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Rasmussen Reports Clinton 39, Trump 43 Trump +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton PPP (D) Clinton 48, Trump 44 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Reuters/Ipsos Clinton 42, Trump 32 Clinton +10
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein IBD/TIPP Clinton 37, Trump 36, Johnson 9, Stein 5 Clinton +1
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein PPP (D) Clinton 45, Trump 41, Johnson 5, Stein 2 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein Reuters/Ipsos Clinton 42, Trump 31, Johnson 5, Stein 4 Clinton +11 |
True. But things are clearly trending back to Trump...for the moment. It won't kill you to admit that. It will likely change again. _________________ "It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI |
Acts-dicted Posts: 8065 7/1/16 11:08 am
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
UncleJD |
| Resident Skeptic wrote: | | UncleJD wrote: | BTW - 7 polls came out yesterday. Only one had Trump ahead, one had him within 1, and the others were way ahead for Hillary.
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton IBD/TIPP Clinton 44, Trump 40 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Rasmussen Reports Clinton 39, Trump 43 Trump +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton PPP (D) Clinton 48, Trump 44 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Reuters/Ipsos Clinton 42, Trump 32 Clinton +10
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein IBD/TIPP Clinton 37, Trump 36, Johnson 9, Stein 5 Clinton +1
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein PPP (D) Clinton 45, Trump 41, Johnson 5, Stein 2 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein Reuters/Ipsos Clinton 42, Trump 31, Johnson 5, Stein 4 Clinton +11 |
True. But things are clearly trending back to Trump...for the moment. It won't kill you to admit that. It will likely change again. |
One out of 7 is a trend?  |
Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere Posts: 3147 7/1/16 11:11 am

|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Resident Skeptic |
| UncleJD wrote: | | Resident Skeptic wrote: | | UncleJD wrote: | BTW - 7 polls came out yesterday. Only one had Trump ahead, one had him within 1, and the others were way ahead for Hillary.
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton IBD/TIPP Clinton 44, Trump 40 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Rasmussen Reports Clinton 39, Trump 43 Trump +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton PPP (D) Clinton 48, Trump 44 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Reuters/Ipsos Clinton 42, Trump 32 Clinton +10
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein IBD/TIPP Clinton 37, Trump 36, Johnson 9, Stein 5 Clinton +1
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein PPP (D) Clinton 45, Trump 41, Johnson 5, Stein 2 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein Reuters/Ipsos Clinton 42, Trump 31, Johnson 5, Stein 4 Clinton +11 |
True. But things are clearly trending back to Trump...for the moment. It won't kill you to admit that. It will likely change again. |
One out of 7 is a trend?  |
The trend is down from a 10-12 point deficit to a 3-5 point deficit and even leading in a prominent poll. That's usually how it goes. It is silly that you are so hard headed about this. _________________ "It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI |
Acts-dicted Posts: 8065 7/1/16 12:21 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
UncleJD |
| Resident Skeptic wrote: |
The trend is down from a 10-12 point deficit to a 3-5 point deficit and even leading in a prominent poll. That's usually how it goes. It is silly that you are so hard headed about this. |
Its silly that you mention one poll out of 7 and call it a victory. Wake me up when he's at least 50/50 |
Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere Posts: 3147 7/1/16 3:28 pm

|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Ventureforth |
| UncleJD wrote: | | Resident Skeptic wrote: | | UncleJD wrote: | BTW - 7 polls came out yesterday. Only one had Trump ahead, one had him within 1, and the others were way ahead for Hillary.
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton IBD/TIPP Clinton 44, Trump 40 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Rasmussen Reports Clinton 39, Trump 43 Trump +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton PPP (D) Clinton 48, Trump 44 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Reuters/Ipsos Clinton 42, Trump 32 Clinton +10
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein IBD/TIPP Clinton 37, Trump 36, Johnson 9, Stein 5 Clinton +1
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein PPP (D) Clinton 45, Trump 41, Johnson 5, Stein 2 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein Reuters/Ipsos Clinton 42, Trump 31, Johnson 5, Stein 4 Clinton +11 |
True. But things are clearly trending back to Trump...for the moment. It won't kill you to admit that. It will likely change again. |
One out of 7 is a trend?  |
What's the margin of error on these? I would guess the poll where Clinton is up by 1 is too close to call. There might be others that are within their margin of error. |
Acts-celerater Posts: 651 7/1/16 4:08 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Resident Skeptic |
| Ventureforth wrote: | | UncleJD wrote: | | Resident Skeptic wrote: | | UncleJD wrote: | BTW - 7 polls came out yesterday. Only one had Trump ahead, one had him within 1, and the others were way ahead for Hillary.
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton IBD/TIPP Clinton 44, Trump 40 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Rasmussen Reports Clinton 39, Trump 43 Trump +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton PPP (D) Clinton 48, Trump 44 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Reuters/Ipsos Clinton 42, Trump 32 Clinton +10
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein IBD/TIPP Clinton 37, Trump 36, Johnson 9, Stein 5 Clinton +1
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein PPP (D) Clinton 45, Trump 41, Johnson 5, Stein 2 Clinton +4
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein Reuters/Ipsos Clinton 42, Trump 31, Johnson 5, Stein 4 Clinton +11 |
True. But things are clearly trending back to Trump...for the moment. It won't kill you to admit that. It will likely change again. |
One out of 7 is a trend?  |
What's the margin of error on these? I would guess the poll where Clinton is up by 1 is too close to call. There might be others that are within their margin of error. |
JD's despising of Trump blinds him to simple things like this race being essentially tied. _________________ "It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI |
Acts-dicted Posts: 8065 7/1/16 4:17 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
UncleJD |
| Resident Skeptic wrote: |
JD's despising of Trump blinds him to simple things like this race being essentially tied. |
RS's blind faith in Trump blinds him to simple numbers. Lets throw out those within 4 pts. Now you have Hillary still up by 10, but that doesn't take into account Thursday's poll numbers with Fox's poll showing Hillary INCREASING her lead. I'm perfectly willing to acknowledge something when it happens. So far there is no trend that doesn't cancel out the other one. At best its stagnant right now. Trump has a lot of ground to cover. I wish him luck. So far there has been ONLY one day that made any difference with me, that was when he gave his short-list for SCOTUS. I think he needs to have some more days like that. Waiting around for Hillary to go to jail isn't a strategy, its a dream. |
Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere Posts: 3147 7/1/16 4:22 pm

|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Resident Skeptic |
| UncleJD wrote: | | Resident Skeptic wrote: |
JD's despising of Trump blinds him to simple things like this race being essentially tied. |
RS's blind faith in Trump blinds him to simple numbers. Lets throw out those within 4 pts. Now you have Hillary still up by 10, but that doesn't take into account Thursday's poll numbers with Fox's poll showing Hillary INCREASING her lead. I'm perfectly willing to acknowledge something when it happens. So far there is no trend that doesn't cancel out the other one. At best its stagnant right now. Trump has a lot of ground to cover. I wish him luck. So far there has been ONLY one day that made any difference with me, that was when he gave his short-list for SCOTUS. I think he needs to have some more days like that. Waiting around for Hillary to go to jail isn't a strategy, its a dream. |
So pointing out normal fluctuations and bounces in polling numbers , to you, constitutes "blind faith in Trump"? You are making too much out of this. But that is what "NeverTrump" cultists do. They are incapable of having a normal conversation about this election. Where was all this outrage and desire to "free the delegates" when the milk-toast candidates like Dole, McCain and Romney were running, who obviously had no prayer of winning? You guys are being played like a fiddle by the elite. If Trump is leading by 8 points in a month I can't wait to hear your spin on that one. _________________ "It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI |
Acts-dicted Posts: 8065 7/1/16 6:48 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Eddie Robbins |
| "NeverTrump" is no more of a cult than the Trumpsters. One group is anti-Trump and the other is pro-Trump. Why is the anti-Trump group considered cultist? |
Acts-pert Poster Posts: 16509 7/1/16 7:17 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Resident Skeptic |
| Eddie Robbins wrote: | | "NeverTrump" is no more of a cult than the Trumpsters. One group is anti-Trump and the other is pro-Trump. Why is the anti-Trump group considered cultist? |
Why is simply backing the nominee cultic? If one cannot vote for the nominee, they can vote Libertarian. But this anti-Trump fanaticism in the GOP is over the top, even to the point of plotting a coup at the convention. _________________ "It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI |
Acts-dicted Posts: 8065 7/1/16 8:03 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
UncleJD |
| Resident Skeptic wrote: | | Eddie Robbins wrote: | | "NeverTrump" is no more of a cult than the Trumpsters. One group is anti-Trump and the other is pro-Trump. Why is the anti-Trump group considered cultist? |
Why is simply backing the nominee cultic? If one cannot vote for the nominee, they can vote Libertarian. But this anti-Trump fanaticism in the GOP is over the top, even to the point of plotting a coup at the convention. |
Blindly dismissing it is the most dangerous thing that the Trumpers are doing. They pretend they can win without nearly half of the party, and maybe they can because of the democrats they have brought in (the ones Trump keeps bragging about). If you didn't like the candidate like you do, you'd be the first to think there was something wrong with getting so much of his support from people who have never voted Republican.
That said, your previous statement is not true. I am not #NEVERTRUMP (though I once was). I'm more #OHNOPLEASETELLMETHISISN'THAPPENING!  |
Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere Posts: 3147 7/1/16 10:11 pm

|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Resident Skeptic |
| UncleJD wrote: | | Resident Skeptic wrote: | | Eddie Robbins wrote: | | "NeverTrump" is no more of a cult than the Trumpsters. One group is anti-Trump and the other is pro-Trump. Why is the anti-Trump group considered cultist? |
Why is simply backing the nominee cultic? If one cannot vote for the nominee, they can vote Libertarian. But this anti-Trump fanaticism in the GOP is over the top, even to the point of plotting a coup at the convention. |
Blindly dismissing it is the most dangerous thing that the Trumpers are doing. They pretend they can win without nearly half of the party, and maybe they can because of the democrats they have brought in (the ones Trump keeps bragging about). If you didn't like the candidate like you do, you'd be the first to think there was something wrong with getting so much of his support from people who have never voted Republican.
That said, your previous statement is not true. I am not #NEVERTRUMP (though I once was). I'm more #OHNOPLEASETELLMETHISISN'THAPPENING!  |
Let's hope you are wrong. _________________ "It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI |
Acts-dicted Posts: 8065 7/1/16 11:23 pm
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Cojak |
| UncleJD wrote: |
I hear you Cojak and respect your opinion, but consider this. There are a lot of smart people out there that love their country and love the conservative movement very, very much who are saying that a Trump presidency will forever end the conservative movement of the Republican party, transforming it into a moderate/populist party and simultaneously cost the majorities in the house and senate. While I lean toward voting for him myself, I'm not willing to completely ignore what they are saying, at least considering the merit. Many well respected Republicans (who are not, in positions of power btw), are willing to bite the bullet with Hillary for 4 years rather than give up conservatism for the next 40. I'm not sure sure if I totally agree with them (like I said, I'm probably going to vote for Trump out of fear of Hillary), but I think they do offer something to think about (unless you just yell "NWO" and completely discount anything that goes against Trump). |
I am as confused as the next person, but it is 'probably' a fact that the next president will appoint 2 (minimum) supreme court justices. I honestly hate to see Hillary appoint them. Other than that I could probably bite the bullet and live with Hillary. (I might do it anyway )
I really do despise the name calling by Trump. The lack of solid ideas, other than the 'pie in the sky: I will be the greatest,' But the supreme court appointees scare me.
However I am pretty liberal myself, so as much as I hate to, I can live with Hillary. I sure ain't leaving this great country!  _________________ Some facts but mostly just my opinion!
jacsher@aol.com
http://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/ |
01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011 Posts: 24285 7/2/16 12:48 am

|
|
|
| |
 |
|
|