| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Message |
Author |
 Re: Misquoted by Link |
skinnybishop |
| FG Minister wrote: | Link. You attributed a quote to me that I did not make.
And BTW - I am not against TJ whatsoever. In fact, I admire his work as a pastor and his mission's work. I have never met TJ or the Professor. I just wanted these two men to sit down together and sort this out. That is the Biblical method. I was very disappointed when that did not happen. I just hate to see anyone's reputation damaged if in fact he is innocent. Many of you see the professor as guilty. I do not. It's that simple. We are looking at the same situation and are coming to two different conclusions. It happens every day. But I am not against TJ whatsoever. I just want these two men to do the right thing and settle this, and clear each other's good names. That's all. |
They DID sit down together.
_________________
Eddie Wiggins |
Acts Enthusiast
Posts: 1055
3/14/24 8:25 pm
|
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
| Re: I Don't Understand |
caviator |
| Mat wrote: | | The nature of politics would suggest that the Tennessee Bishop had a position, thus the TN board had a position. After all they are the Bishop's subordinates. |
The funny thing is that TJ, known for his pro-women bishop stance, has now successfully produced a case which will remain the leading argument against women-bishops for years to come. Someone high up masterfully crafted this one as well. They used him in a similar way through the ToT ordeal back in the day, which he later regretted when they started taking the 5% from the missionaries instead of from the churches. But no one should suspect this had anything to do with splitting TN in two… |
Hey, DOC
Posts: 58
3/15/24 6:21 am
|
|
|
| |
|
| Re: I Don't Understand |
Carolyn Smith |
| caviator wrote: | | Mat wrote: | | The nature of politics would suggest that the Tennessee Bishop had a position, thus the TN board had a position. After all they are the Bishop's subordinates. |
The funny thing is that TJ, known for his pro-women bishop stance, has now successfully produced a case which will remain the leading argument against women-bishops for years to come. Someone high up masterfully crafted this one as well. They used him in a similar way through the ToT ordeal back in the day, which he later regretted when they started taking the 5% from the missionaries instead of from the churches. But no one should suspect this had anything to do with splitting TN in two… |
What does this have to do with the "Women as bishops" discussion?
_________________
"More of Him...less of me."
http://twitter.com/camiracle77
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=691241499&ref=name |
Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology
Posts: 5923
3/16/24 9:52 pm
|
|
|
| |
|
| Re: I Don't Understand |
georgiapath |
| Carolyn Smith wrote: | | caviator wrote: | | Mat wrote: | | The nature of politics would suggest that the Tennessee Bishop had a position, thus the TN board had a position. After all they are the Bishop's subordinates. |
The funny thing is that TJ, known for his pro-women bishop stance, has now successfully produced a case which will remain the leading argument against women-bishops for years to come. Someone high up masterfully crafted this one as well. They used him in a similar way through the ToT ordeal back in the day, which he later regretted when they started taking the 5% from the missionaries instead of from the churches. But no one should suspect this had anything to do with splitting TN in two… |
What does this have to do with the "Women as bishops" discussion? |
That's what I wondered., and why he posted it 2 places. Think he wanted to make sure everyone saw it as if it was a big no no. |
Acts-dicted
Posts: 7604
3/17/24 8:49 am
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Nature Boy Florida |
I wanted to make a new topic - but I click on the New Topic button and it resets me to the Acts home page. HMMM.
_________________
Whether you like it or not, learn to love it, because its the best thing going today! |
Acts-pert Poster
Posts: 16646
3/18/24 6:55 pm
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
caviator |
| Same here. Comments also do not appear regularly or appear with delay, hence the unintended dual comments. |
Hey, DOC
Posts: 58
3/19/24 7:21 am
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Carolyn Smith |
| Nature Boy Florida wrote: | | I wanted to make a new topic - but I click on the New Topic button and it resets me to the Acts home page. HMMM. |
It's working fine for me but I sent Shaun an e-mail and asked him to check it since you're the 2nd person who has said that.
_________________
"More of Him...less of me."
http://twitter.com/camiracle77
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=691241499&ref=name |
Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology
Posts: 5923
3/19/24 9:34 pm
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Carolyn Smith |
| Carolyn Smith wrote: | | Nature Boy Florida wrote: | | I wanted to make a new topic - but I click on the New Topic button and it resets me to the Acts home page. HMMM. |
It's working fine for me but I sent Shaun an e-mail and asked him to check it since you're the 2nd person who has said that. |
E-mails did not go through so I sent Shaun a PM.
_________________
"More of Him...less of me."
http://twitter.com/camiracle77
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=691241499&ref=name |
Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology
Posts: 5923
3/19/24 9:39 pm
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Nature Boy Florida |
Anyone get how the final vote went?
Shouldn't the men voting guilty or not guilty go on record?
_________________
Whether you like it or not, learn to love it, because its the best thing going today! |
Acts-pert Poster
Posts: 16646
4/3/24 9:44 am
|
|
|
| |
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
