Actscelerate.com Forum Index Actscelerate.com
Open Any Time -- Day or Night
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
r/Actscelerate
Browse by what's: hot | new | rising | top of the week

Roy Moore 11 points ahead, and now...........(L)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
   Actscelerate.com Forum Index -> Acts-Celerate Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Message Author
Post Resident Skeptic
Dave Dorsey wrote:
UncleJD wrote:
Ouch, that needs a lot of unpacking but I'll go on the record to say that I think a 30+ politician fondling a 14 year-old IS pedophilia. I hope it didn't happen for both politics sake and the sake of a 14-year-old girl being taken advantage of. If it did not, then I hope the conspiracy of accusation is held accountable. If it did happen, then he should step down.

This is the state of the pro-Trump right. It's one thing to say "this allegation is not credible and should be ignored." I disagree with that position. I think it's a wrong position. But I don't think it's an insane position.

But, "So what if it did happen? So what if he did sexually assault a 14 year old forty years ago?" -- wow, that's something else entirely, but that's where we find ourselves.

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/359749-gop-official-says-hed-vote-for-moore-even-if-allegations-are-true

https://www.redstate.com/jon-street/2017/11/10/roy-moore-loyalists-worse-bill-clinton-enablers/


You seem to assume that being a Trump supporter is a factor in every thought we have. I'm 52. Is it not possible that life experience had molded my opinions long before Trump was ever a factor in politics? Your comment just proves your own short-sided bigotry.

I was a social worker for short time. I have been working in public high schools since 2005. Some things I've witnessed have cast doubt on the staunch positions I used to take on issues like this. For example, I know a 14 year old 8th grader right now, fully developed physically, blonde hair , blue eyes, that could easily pass for a 19 year old. With her legal guardian's permission, she is dating a 27 year old. I overheard her telling a group of friends in the classroom about her very active sex-life with this man. Her guardian (grandmother) just loves the young man and is OK with their having sex. As soon as she turns 16, her grandmother is going to sign the emancipation papers just so this 27 year old boyfriend does not get in trouble.

Now I suppose I could report all of this to Child Protective Services. But why should I? In fact, as disgusting and sick as all of this is, if I was on a jury right now in a trial to convict that boyfriend of statutory rape, I'd vote not guilty. I see no value in destroying the guy's life and wasting tax-payer money, all because this girl has a stupid family.

Before you get on a soap-box, please tell me if you think your 25 year old some (for example) should go to jail if he was seduced by a 16 year old and succumbed to temptation. Does he deserve to be labeled a sexual predator for the rest of his life? I think not.
_________________
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
11/10/17 12:51 pm


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Reply with quote
Post UncleJD
Resident Skeptic wrote:

Before you get on a soap-box, please tell me if you think your 25 year old some (for example) should go to jail if he was seduced by a 16 year old and succumbed to temptation. Does he deserve to be labeled a sexual predator for the rest of his life? I think not.


What about a 35 year-old? What would be the difference in who is to blame?
Golf Cart Mafia Consigliere
Posts: 3147
11/10/17 1:05 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Dave Dorsey
Resident Skeptic wrote:
You seem to assume that being a Trump supporter is a factor in every thought we have.

I'm not sure why I would think that. Laughing

Resident Skeptic wrote:
Before you get on a soap-box, please tell me if you think your 25 year old some (for example) should go to jail if he was seduced by a 16 year old and succumbed to temptation. Does he deserve to be labeled a sexual predator for the rest of his life? I think not.

I think there are places where statutory rape laws aren't the best. For example, an 18 year old who becomes a sex offender for having consensual sex with his 16 or 17 year old girlfriend. 25 to 16 is well into the range of something that should be considered a statutory crime, just based on the age and maturity difference, IMO... that'd be in the gray area, maybe, but any more than that and it starts to get clear.

Fortunately, though, that's not at all relevant to what we're talking about. We're not talking about whether Moore is a criminal who should register as a sex offender if the allegations are true, we're talking about whether he is qualified to be a United States Senator if the allegations are true.

You apparently believe the answer is that he is qualified, is that correct?
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 13654
11/10/17 1:05 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Resident Skeptic
Dave Dorsey wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
You seem to assume that being a Trump supporter is a factor in every thought we have.

I'm not sure why I would think that. Laughing

Resident Skeptic wrote:
Before you get on a soap-box, please tell me if you think your 25 year old some (for example) should go to jail if he was seduced by a 16 year old and succumbed to temptation. Does he deserve to be labeled a sexual predator for the rest of his life? I think not.

I think there are places where statutory rape laws aren't the best. For example, an 18 year old who becomes a sex offender for having consensual sex with his 16 or 17 year old girlfriend. 25 to 16 is well into the range of something that should be considered a statutory crime, just based on the age and maturity difference, IMO... that'd be in the gray area, maybe, but any more than that and it starts to get clear.

Fortunately, though, that's not at all relevant to what we're talking about. We're not talking about whether Moore is a criminal who should register as a sex offender if the allegations are true, we're talking about whether he is qualified to be a United States Senator if the allegations are true.

You apparently believe the answer is that he is qualified, is that correct?


Absolutely he is qualified. He has proven it. Questionable charges from left-wing conspirators don't change that.
_________________
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
11/10/17 1:10 pm


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Reply with quote
Post bonnie knox
Quote:
Let's say it happened. If she had been in an affair with a liberal Democrat, she most likely would never tell because of her own ideological bent,...


Why are you saying that? Corfman is said to have voted Republican in the last 3 presidential elections.

And no, I'm not going to give someone who was an assistant district attorney a pass for not knowing the age of consent law in Alabama, which at the time and still is 16. Good grief!
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 14803
11/10/17 1:28 pm


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Post bonnie knox
And a word about pedophilia--I believe that would best be used to describe the unnatural sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children.
I would not apply that word to use what is alleged to have happened here.
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 14803
11/10/17 1:30 pm


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Post bonnie knox
Quote:
The left has an issue with automatically believing any allegation of sexual misconduct


Oh, I don't think they gave much credence to Juanita Broaddrick.
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 14803
11/10/17 1:33 pm


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Post bonnie knox
Quote:
Fortunately, though, that's not at all relevant to what we're talking about. We're not talking about whether Moore is a criminal who should register as a sex offender if the allegations are true, we're talking about whether he is qualified to be a United States Senator if the allegations are true.


Would you vote for him if you believed the allegations are true (if you were in Alabama)?
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 14803
11/10/17 1:37 pm


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply with quote
Post Dave Dorsey
Resident Skeptic wrote:
Absolutely he is qualified. He has proven it. Questionable charges from left-wing conspirators don't change that.

That's not what I asked.

If the allegations were true, would it disqualify him from being a US Senator?


Last edited by Dave Dorsey on 11/10/17 1:40 pm; edited 1 time in total
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 13654
11/10/17 1:39 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Dave Dorsey
bonnie knox wrote:
Oh, I don't think they gave much credence to Juanita Broaddrick.

That's very true.
[Insert Acts Pun Here]
Posts: 13654
11/10/17 1:40 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Resident Skeptic
Dave Dorsey wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
Absolutely he is qualified. He has proven it. Questionable charges from left-wing conspirators don't change that.

That's not what I asked.

If the allegations were true, would it disqualify him from being a US Senator?



This late in the game I would vote for him.
_________________
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
11/10/17 2:01 pm


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Reply with quote
Post Nature Boy Florida
It is silly to defend this guy - or destroy him until we see more of the facts.

But if he really had a pattern of trying to get 14 year olds - he is a dirtbag - and should not be elected to anything.

That tired old story of she looked 18 doesn't cut it. Maybe he really only defends 9 commandments.
_________________
Whether you like it or not, learn to love it, because its the best thing going today!
Acts-pert Poster
Posts: 16646
11/10/17 2:22 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Resident Skeptic
Nature Boy Florida wrote:
It is silly to defend this guy - or destroy him until we see more of the facts.

But if he really had a pattern of trying to get 14 year olds - he is a dirtbag - and should not be elected to anything.

That tired old story of she looked 18 doesn't cut it. Maybe he really only defends 9 commandments.


Or maybe would should remember what happened to Herman Cain and support Roy Moore.
_________________
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
11/10/17 6:40 pm


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Reply with quote
Post Resident Skeptic
A poster on another forum had this to say....

Quote:

Typically child molesters do not molest one child. It is a serial thing. The Washington Post has put a lot of effort in getting Moore's opponent elected. It sounds like Moore ( when he was in his 30's) asked a 16 year old out - it has not been stated if he knew she was 16- with the right make up and attitude it is not tough for most 16 year olds to pass as older.

It also has been said he asked an 18 year old out - age of legal consent , both the 16 and 18 year old said no and that was the end of it . Getting asked out is not harassment, it is getting asked out . We have one 40 something telling a story about something that allegedly happened 30 years ago. No real pattern of others.

On the other side we have the Washington Post putting a lot of energy into getting the opponent elected. We have the progressive left showing ads of Gillespie in Virginia in a car or jeep chasing Hispanic Down, we have Bork - which has his own definition in the dictionary because of what the left did to him. We have Clarence Thomas , JC Watts, Caine , Romney all accused.

We have the lies on Uranium one , Benghazi , emails. There isn't the consistency to not believe Moore , there is the consistency of Washington Post to not believe them. As far as the woman, not all women tell the truth and not all women lie , that is why we have due process.


As far as "due process" is concerned, the statutes of limitation have expired. Thus we have the known characters of the Post and of Moore to base a decision on. Moore wins.
_________________
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
11/10/17 7:27 pm


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Reply with quote
Post Cojak
The man is toast. Right or wrong, he is toast. He gave an interview and said he did date young ladies from 16-19 . The man is 32-34 AT THE TIME. That might have floated when it happened, but it sounds tinny at this time.

YES, it could be a left wing attack, but in our country mentally (not leagally) the man is guilty if 4 different accusers pop up, he is toast. Mentally he is placed in a category with whatshisname (the movie producer or Hollywood mover) who just got shot down. Not fair, of course, but FACTs of life in the USA today!

And I have no idea if he is guilty or not. Shocked
_________________
Some facts but mostly just my opinion!
jacsher@aol.com
http://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/
01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011
Posts: 24285
11/11/17 12:33 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post chestnut ridge
Cojak wrote:
The man is toast. Right or wrong, he is toast. He gave an interview and said he did date young ladies from 16-19 . The man is 32-34 AT THE TIME. That might have floated when it happened, but it sounds tinny at this time.

YES, it could be a left wing attack, but in our country mentally (not leagally) the man is guilty if 4 different accusers pop up, he is toast. Mentally he is placed in a category with whatshisname (the movie producer or Hollywood mover) who just got shot down. Not fair, of course, but FACTs of life in the USA today!

And I have no idea if he is guilty or not. Shocked


He also has some smoke around him concerning his charity. He seems to be tone deaf.

He was assistant district attorney, appointed to the 16th circuit as a judge and ran for supreme count twice and won but only served 2 years each time

Not really impressive but he wraps himself around "conservative christian values"

hmmmm
Acts Enthusiast
Posts: 1722
11/11/17 8:24 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Resident Skeptic
chestnut ridge wrote:
Cojak wrote:
The man is toast. Right or wrong, he is toast. He gave an interview and said he did date young ladies from 16-19 . The man is 32-34 AT THE TIME. That might have floated when it happened, but it sounds tinny at this time.

YES, it could be a left wing attack, but in our country mentally (not leagally) the man is guilty if 4 different accusers pop up, he is toast. Mentally he is placed in a category with whatshisname (the movie producer or Hollywood mover) who just got shot down. Not fair, of course, but FACTs of life in the USA today!

And I have no idea if he is guilty or not. Shocked


He also has some smoke around him concerning his charity. He seems to be tone deaf.

He was assistant district attorney, appointed to the 16th circuit as a judge and ran for supreme count twice and won but only served 2 years each time

Not really impressive but he wraps himself around "conservative christian values"

hmmmm


Sounds to me like your looking for an excuse now not to defend him. This man stood up for his State against the tyranny of the SCOTUS with their unconstitutional gay marriage decision. He did what State officers are supposed to do in defending their States from Federal overreach.
_________________
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
11/11/17 10:04 am


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Reply with quote
Post chestnut ridge
Resident Skeptic wrote:
chestnut ridge wrote:
Cojak wrote:
The man is toast. Right or wrong, he is toast. He gave an interview and said he did date young ladies from 16-19 . The man is 32-34 AT THE TIME. That might have floated when it happened, but it sounds tinny at this time.

YES, it could be a left wing attack, but in our country mentally (not leagally) the man is guilty if 4 different accusers pop up, he is toast. Mentally he is placed in a category with whatshisname (the movie producer or Hollywood mover) who just got shot down. Not fair, of course, but FACTs of life in the USA today!

And I have no idea if he is guilty or not. Shocked


He also has some smoke around him concerning his charity. He seems to be tone deaf.

He was assistant district attorney, appointed to the 16th circuit as a judge and ran for supreme count twice and won but only served 2 years each time

Not really impressive but he wraps himself around "conservative christian values"

hmmmm


Sounds to me like your looking for an excuse now not to defend him. This man stood up for his State against the tyranny of the SCOTUS with their unconstitutional gay marriage decision. He did what State officers are supposed to do in defending their States from Federal overreach.


He broke the law.

This is my state and this is my vote for senate.

He also is known as the 10 commandment judge. Because he would not remove the commandments after being told to do so.

He broke the law

He never challenged Sessions or Shelby. He saw an opening (opportunity) A lot of people will vote Moore because he is GOP but do not like him. Sure he beat Strange but he ran to drain the swap.

I wonder if he will ride his horse to the capital
Acts Enthusiast
Posts: 1722
11/11/17 11:24 am


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Resident Skeptic
chestnut ridge wrote:
Resident Skeptic wrote:
chestnut ridge wrote:
Cojak wrote:
The man is toast. Right or wrong, he is toast. He gave an interview and said he did date young ladies from 16-19 . The man is 32-34 AT THE TIME. That might have floated when it happened, but it sounds tinny at this time.

YES, it could be a left wing attack, but in our country mentally (not leagally) the man is guilty if 4 different accusers pop up, he is toast. Mentally he is placed in a category with whatshisname (the movie producer or Hollywood mover) who just got shot down. Not fair, of course, but FACTs of life in the USA today!

And I have no idea if he is guilty or not. Shocked


He also has some smoke around him concerning his charity. He seems to be tone deaf.

He was assistant district attorney, appointed to the 16th circuit as a judge and ran for supreme count twice and won but only served 2 years each time

Not really impressive but he wraps himself around "conservative christian values"

hmmmm


Sounds to me like your looking for an excuse now not to defend him. This man stood up for his State against the tyranny of the SCOTUS with their unconstitutional gay marriage decision. He did what State officers are supposed to do in defending their States from Federal overreach.


He broke the law.

This is my state and this is my vote for senate.

He also is known as the 10 commandment judge. Because he would not remove the commandments after being told to do so.

He broke the law

He never challenged Sessions or Shelby. He saw an opening (opportunity) A lot of people will vote Moore because he is GOP but do not like him. Sure he beat Strange but he ran to drain the swap.

I wonder if he will ride his horse to the capital


Apparently, you do not understand that the Framers intended State officers to do just what Moore did when unlawful Federal intrusion warrants it. Federal laws or court rulings that violate the Constitution are not laws at all and must be resisted. You should be proud of Moore. Unless more State officers start doing what Moore did, your grandchildren will be living in a communist country before too long.
_________________
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves UPCI
Acts-dicted
Posts: 8065
11/11/17 11:51 am


View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Reply with quote
Post Cojak
All I am saying is in your thirties if you feel a need to date teens it APPEARS strange NOW. No matter how it looked 40 years ago, the opposition KNOWS how 'odd' this sounds brought up at this time in history. I am not judging right or wrong. Just stating facts of politics. Bringing that up was like Hillary's group mentioning RUSSIA! It caught on and will haunt Trump forever.

These charges will haunt Moore from now on, and be a distractor. I am not there, I won't vote one way or the other but my common sense tells me the man is toast, politically! Shocked
_________________
Some facts but mostly just my opinion!
jacsher@aol.com
http://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/
01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011
Posts: 24285
11/11/17 1:17 pm


View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Actscelerate.com Forum Index -> Acts-Celerate Post new topic   Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Acts-celerate Terms of Use | Acts-celerate Policy
Contact the Administrator.


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group :: Spelling by SpellingCow.