Actscelerate.com

Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology Posts: 6385 **12/12/16 9:44 am**

YOu have to read between the lines. Most of those reporting the type of hacking has absolutely no idea of the technology used nor do they understand the high and low levels of intrusion .

High Level intrusion is compiled with standard software ie. "C , Pascal , Java ect. and usually requires interaction with the victim of the hack.

Low Level intrusion is complied with assembly code at the core of the program and does not need end user involvement. This is the worst and most dangerous.

[Insert Acts Pun Here] Posts: 14803 **12/12/16 9:47 am**

The thing is that our intelligence has been saying for months that Russia has been hacking us.
I'm sure the nitty gritty about how they arrived at the conclusions is mostly classified.
Some of the questions now are was there an intent to influence the election, was there another playing leaving fingerprints pointing to "Fancy Bear," in other words, the "false flag" that Bolton suggests could have happened.

Re: (video news clip)

01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011 Posts: 24285 **12/12/16 9:48 am**

[Insert Acts Pun Here] Posts: 14803 **12/12/16 9:59 am**

01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011 Posts: 24285 **12/12/16 10:10 am**

Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology Posts: 6385 **12/12/16 11:12 am**

Heres the catch, HOw could Russia influence the election by hacking? They have not modified the election results. This could have been detected. So what was the nature of " Influence " and how was it used , if any ?

[Insert Acts Pun Here] Posts: 14803 **12/12/16 1:50 pm**

I think what it boils down to so far (as much as the public has been given the info) is that DNC emails and Hillary emails were hacked and released. There is speculation that it was released with the intent of making them look bad and therefore hurt Hillary's chances.

01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011 Posts: 24285 **12/12/16 7:17 pm**

Many things are possible. My honest opinion is YES, that SOMEONE released those things to hurt Hillary. but I THINK USING Russia was to put higher importance on the hacking than is merited. In this world there are many many people with the ability and means to hack into those accounts. Especially since it was very possibly 'Allowed' by an individual who answered a Phishing expedition that security did not see as Phishing and said do it.

I simply think using Russia was an attempt at a sort of smoke screen. Smile

_________________
Some facts but mostly just my opinion!
jacsher@aol.com
http://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/

[Insert Acts Pun Here] Posts: 14803 **12/13/16 7:27 pm**

http://hotair.com/archives/2016/12/13/cybersecurity-expert-to-trump-actually-we-did-catch-russia-in-the-act-when-they-hacked-the-dnc/

Re: (L)

01000001 01100011 01110100 01110011 Posts: 24285 **12/14/16 11:23 pm**

Re: (L)

[Insert Acts Pun Here] Posts: 14803 **12/15/16 8:53 am**

I think it's like convicting a criminal with evidence that goes "beyond reasonable doubt."
I guess you could also think about it on the converse side. What are the chances that Russia hasn't been hacking us?

Yeah, hot air, lol. I think Rick Perry inadvertently referred to the site as "Hot Gas." LOL. They typically have links to other sources in their pieces, they lean conservative, politically, they may use click bait at times, but they are not typically purveyors of merely sensational stuff or conspiracy theories. That's just my assessment.
Anyway, Hot Air is quoting Dmitri Alperovitch who is an executive of a cybersecurity company. Here is what Alperovitch wrote about this situation back in June. From the horse's mouth, so to speak:

https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/bears-midst-intrusion-democratic-national-committee/

"In particular, we identified advanced methods consistent with nation-state level capabilities including deliberate targeting and ‘access management’ tradecraft – both groups were constantly going back into the environment to change out their implants, modify persistent methods, move to new Command & Control channels and perform other tasks to try to stay ahead of being detected."

Acts-dicted Posts: 7604 **12/15/16 11:13 am**

[Insert Acts Pun Here] Posts: 14803 **1/5/17 9:03 pm**

US Intelligence identifies WikiLeaks and Russian go-betweens.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/05/politics/intel-report-says-us-identifies-go-betweens-who-gave-emails-to-wikileaks/index.html?adkey=bn

Meanwhile, whatever it was that Trump claimed to know that nobody else knew that he was supposed to divulge Tuesday or Wednesday is still unknown.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-divulges-no-new-election-hacking-details/story?id=44565357

Hon. Dr. in Acts-celeratology Posts: 6385 **1/6/17 8:48 am**

[Insert Acts Pun Here] Posts: 14803 **1/11/17 10:58 pm**

Well, Trump has finally admitted, "As far as hacking, I think it was Russia..."

Man, it took him long enough to finally acknowledge that.